Reactive Carbide‐Based Synthesis and Microstructure of NASICON Sodium Metal All Solid‐State Electrolyte

C Callum J. Campbell (Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA) S Scott Monismith (Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA) V Vikalp Raj (Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA) Y Yixian Wang (School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education) Q Qianqian Yan (School of Marine Technology and Equipment, State Key Laboratory of Tropic Ocean Engineering Materials and Materials Evaluation, Hainan Provincial Key Lab of Fine Chem, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) C Cole D. Fincher R Rohit Raj Y Yet‐Ming Chiang (Department of Materials Science & Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA) J John Watt (Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA) J Josefine D. McBrayer (Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA) D David Mitlin (Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA)

Abstract

Abstract Reactive carbide precursor‐based synthesis of NASICON‐type NZSP (Na 1+x Zr 2 Si x P 3‐x O 12 ) solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) is demonstrated, in contrast to the established oxide‐based approach. Exothermic decomposition of ZrC and SiC in air homogenizes microstructure, yielding 98% compact density after conventional sintering at 1200 °C. Quantitative stereology demonstrates that significant microstructural differences are present. Compacts of carbide‐derived Carb‐NZSP are 98% dense with a secondary zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ) volume fraction of 0.2% ± 0.3%, versus 93% dense and 3% ± 1% for oxide‐derived baseline. For Carb‐NZSP, the secondary glassy phosphate phase is agglomerated, while for baseline, it is dispersed and percolated. Electrochemical testing combined with post‐mortem analysis demonstrates how microstructural control of secondary phases is critical for dendrite suppression: Carb‐NZSP critical current density (CCD) is 3.1 ± 0.8 mA cm − 2 at 0.1 mAh cm − 2 , versus 1.0 ± 0.7 mA cm −2 at 0.1 mAh cm −2 . Cryogenic focused ion beam (cryo‐FIB) analysis demonstrates that in both materials, the porous 2D sheet‐like sodium metal dendrites propagate around and subsume NZSP grains, likely following a path enriched with glassy phase and with porosity. Dendrites also flow around isolated zirconia particles. Phase field simulation reveals deflection of dendrites by mechanically tough zirconia, while brittle glassy phase accelerates dendrite growth, especially when finely distributed.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 16
Published March 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (11)

C

Callum J. Campbell

Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

S

Scott Monismith

Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA

V

Vikalp Raj

Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

Y

Yixian Wang

School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education

Q

Qianqian Yan

School of Marine Technology and Equipment, State Key Laboratory of Tropic Ocean Engineering Materials and Materials Evaluation, Hainan Provincial Key Lab of Fine Chem, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

C

Cole D. Fincher

R

Rohit Raj

Y

Yet‐Ming Chiang

Department of Materials Science & Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA

J

John Watt

Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA

J

Josefine D. McBrayer

Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA

D

David Mitlin

Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA