Real-world analysis of 2IR immune response score in urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Abstract
739 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is often used to treat UC, however many patients (pts) exhibit resistance. Using bulk RNA sequencing of pre-treatment tissue from ImVigor 210 and CheckMate 275 trials, an immune response score (2IR) was previously developed to predict ICI response by determining the comparative expression of genes involved in anti-tumorigenic adaptive immune response and pro-tumorigenic inflammation. Here, we evaluated the 2IR score as a prognostic or predictive biomarker in real-world pts with UC. Methods: Specimens from pts with UC (n = 6395) were profiled at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) using next generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA and RNA. 2IR was calculated by comparative RNA expression of 10 adaptive immune genes and 39 pro-tumorigenic genes. Tumors were classified as 2IR-Low (2IR ≤ -0.5), -Mid (-0.5 < 2IR < 0), and -High (2IR ≥ 0) as previously described. Spearman correlation analysis was utilized to compare 2IR with PD-L1 combined proportion score (CPS), tumor mutation burden (TMB), interferon score (IFN) and the tumor microenvironment (TME) cell fractions estimated using quanTIseq. Clinical outcomes included real-world overall survival (OS) from ICI start to last contact and time on treatment (ToT) with pembrolizumab, obtained via matched insurance claims data and calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods while Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox proportional model. Results: Of the 6395 UC samples, 9.5% (n = 611) were classified as 2IR-High, 42.7% (n=2730) 2IR-Mid, and 47.8% (n=3054) 2IR-Low. In pts with Upper Tract UC primary (UTUC, n = 1104), 2IR was comparatively lower than in pts with bladder cancer primary (BC, n = 4923) (median: -0.53 vs. -0.47, p < 0.001). 2IR shows a positive correlation with TMB (r = 0.23; p < 0.001), IFN score (r = 0.21; p < 0.001) and insignificant correlation with PD-L1 CPS (r = 0.09; p <0.001). 2IR-High positively correlated with mutations in TP53 , RB1 , and ARID1A (all p < 0.0001), amplification of ERBB2 (p < 0.0001), and microsatellite-instability high status (p < 0.0001), but not with FGFR3 mutations or fusions. 2IR positively correlated with immune cell fractions, such as CD4 + T (r = 0.09), CD8 + T (r = 0.22), and dendritic cell (r = 0.18), but negatively correlated with B cells (r = -0.06), M1 macrophages (r = -0.25), M2 macrophages (r = -0.08) and neutrophils (r = -0.12). Pts treated with 2IR-High tumors had longer ToT on pembrolizumab (HR = 0.65 CI 0.55 - 0.77, p <0.001) and OS from ICI start (HR = 0.51, CI 0.41 – 0.62, p < 0.001) compared to pts with 2IR-Low UC. This association held for both primary BC and UTUC. Conclusions: In a real-world cohort, we validate the 2IR score and suggest that it is prognostic for OS and predictive for pembrolizumab ToT, consistent with a positive correlation with known predictors of ICI response. Prospective studies are needed to further validate this biomarker for use in clinical practice, especially given the evolving UC treatment landscape.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Jason Robert Brown
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Tolulope Tosin Adeyelu
Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ
Andrew Elliott
Arnab Basu
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Mehmet Asim Bilen
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Roger Li
Department of Genitourinary Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA
Tyler F. Stewart
Department of Medicine, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Elisabeth I. Heath
Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Daniel M. Geynisman
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Norm Smith
Caris Life Sciences, Irving, TX
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA