Real-world comparison of cabazitaxel vs. 177-lutetium-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
Abstract
70 Background: 177-Lutetium Prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become an established part in treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC patients to approximate current Phase-III patient selection criteria. Results: Of 373 mCRPC patients, 14% received cabazitaxel vs. 65% Lu-PSMA vs. 21% both. Patients undergoing Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older (median 72 vs. 66 years, p<0.01) and displayed a higher proportion of ECOG ≥2 (12 vs. 5.0%, p=0.1), relative to cabazitaxel patients. Rates of PSA50 were 32% vs. 0% for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel (13.4 vs. 7.1 months, p<0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.38, p<0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed with median OS of 14.7 vs. 16.5 vs. 29.6 months for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both treatments (p<0.01). In sensitivity analyses of 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both therapies qualitatively remained the same compared to the entire cohort. Conclusions: In real-world setting, Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates compared to cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered as a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the EMA-approval. Characteristics of 296 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients stratified according to treatment of cabazitaxel vs. 177 - Lutetium- prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu-PSMA). Characteristic N Overall,N = 296 1 CabazitaxelN = 52 (18%) 1 Lu-PSMA,N = 244 (82%) 1 p-value 2 Age at mCRPC, years 192 71 (64, 76) 66 (58, 71) 72 (66, 78) <0.001 PSA at m CRPC, ng/ml 141 18 (6, 72) 63 (12, 144) 15 (6, 64) 0.044 Number of CRPC lines 296 3 (2, 4) 4 (3, 5) 3 (2, 4) <0.001 Cycles systemic treatment 229 3 (2, 6) 5 (3, 6) 3 (2, 6) 0.031 PSA response, % 39 20 (0, 66) 15 (0, 23) 25 (0, 68) 0.3 PSA50 39 11 (28%) 0 (0%) 11 (32%) 0.3 PSA90 39 5 (13%) 0 (0%) 5 (15%) 0.9 ECOG status at mCRPC 109 0.10 0 52 (48%) 14 (70%) 38 (43%) 1 45 (41%) 5 (25%) 40 (45%) >=2 12 (11%) 1 (5%) 11 (12%) Cardiovascular disease 183 66 (36%) 13 (35%) 53 (36%) 0.9 Gleason Score 8-10 259 181 (70%) 39 (80%) 142 (68%) 0.10 De Novo mHSPC 290 161 (56%) 33 (63%) 128 (54%) 0.2 High volume mHSPC 146 99 (68%) 24 (73%) 75 (66%) 0.5 Metastatic sites at mCRPC 130 0.8 M1a 14 (11%) 3 (13%) 11 (10%) M1b 104 (80%) 20 (83%) 84 (79%) M1c 12 (9%) 1 (4%) 11 (10%) Treatment mHSPC 126 0.034 ADT mono 25 (20%) 4 (20%) 21 (20%) ARSI 58 (46%) 4 (20%) 54 (51%) Docetaxel 34 (27%) 10 (50%) 24 (23%) Triplet 3 (2%) 1 (5%) 2 (2%) Other 6 (5%) 1 (5%) 5 (5%) Treatment 1st line mCRPC 296 <0.001 ADT mono 29 (10%) 6 (12%) 23 (9%) Chemotherapy 53 (18%) 19 (37%) 34 (14%) Lu-PSMA 28 (10%) 0 (0%) 28 (11%) ARSI 163 (55%) 26 (50%) 137 (56%) PARPi +/- ARSI 1 (0.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.4%) Radium 20 (7%) 0 (0%) 20 (8%) None/Other/NA 2 (1%) 1 (2%) 1 (0.4%) Treatment 2nd line mCRPC 296 <0.001 Chemotherapy 69 (23%) 27 (52%) 42 (17%) Lu-PSMA 73 (25%) 0 (0%) 73 (30%) ARSI 114 (39%) 25 (48%) 89 (36%) PARPi+/- ARSI 5 (2%) 0 (0%) 5 (2%) Radium 13 (4%) 0 (0%) 13 (5%) None/Other/NA 22 (7%) 0 (0%) 22 (9%) 1 Median (IQR); n (%). 2 Wilcoxon rank sum test; Fisher’s exact test; Pearson’s Chi-square test. PSA: Prostate-specific antigen, ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology group, mHSPC: metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, ADT: Androgen deprivation therapy, ARSI: Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, PARPi: poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitors, NA: Unknown.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Mike Wenzel
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Florestan Koll
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Benedikt Hoeh
Clara Humke
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Carolin Siech
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
Nicolai Mader
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Daniel Groener
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Thomas Steuber
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Markus Graefen
Tobias Maurer
Christian H Brandts
Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Severine Banek
Felix Chun
Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Philipp Mandel
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany