Real-world evaluation of CXCL9/10 with PD-L1 and TMB as predictors of pembrolizumab benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

S Shipra Gandhi (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) S Sachin Kumar Deshmukh (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) M Madison T. Canning (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) D Dario Trapani S Sharon Wu (Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) J Jose Pablo Leone (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) K Kevin Kalinsky (Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta) E Evanthia T. Roussos Torres S Sunil S. Badve M Mayukhmala Jana (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA) A Anant Madabhushi S Sahar Almahfouz (Emory University, Atlanta, GA) H Hilmi Al-Shakshir (Emory University, Atlanta, GA) M Maryam B. Lustberg (Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) K Kazuaki Takabe G Giuseppe Curigliano G George W. Sledge P Pawel Kalinski

Abstract

1125 Background: Pembrolizumab is approved for TNBC; however, current biomarkers PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have limited predictive accuracy and show weak correlation with clinical benefit. We evaluated whether chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10) that recruit cytotoxic T cells into the tumor microenvironment (TME) may improve prediction of pembrolizumab benefit beyond PD-L1 and TMB. Methods: TNBC tumors (n=3662) were profiled by next-generation sequencing (592 NextSeq; WES/WTS NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Chemokine expression was classified as high vs low based on 50 th percentile. Immune cells were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). PD-L1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (22C3 ≥10%), and TMB by nonsynonymous mutations/Mb (high ≥10). Real-world median overall survival (mOS) was derived from insurance claims and calculated from pembrolizumab initiation to last contact. Associations were tested using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple comparison adjustment ( q<0.05 ). Results: CXCL9/ 10- high expression showed increased fraction of CD8⁺ T, dendritic cells and higher IFN-γ signatures ( CXCL9-high vs low : 1.3% vs 0%, 3.1% vs 2.8%, –0.09 vs –0.47; CXCL10 -high vs low: 1.1% vs 0%, 3.1% vs 2.7%, –0.1 vs –0.46), respectively all q<0.05 . Among patients treated with pembrolizumab (n=750), CXCL9 / 10- high expression was associated with improved mOS ( CXCL9-high : 24.5 months (m) vs 15.8 m; CXCL10-high : 23.4 m vs 17 m; all p<0.05 ) compared to CXCL9/10 -low; PD-L1+ tumors had improved mOS (24.3 m vs 18.6 m, p=0.007 ) compared with PD-L1-negative; and TMB-low tumors had numerically improved mOS (21.7 m vs 17.5, p=0.08 ) compared with TMB-high. Combining CXCL9 / 10 with PD-L1 or TMB identified subgroups of tumors with PD-L1-negative and TMB-high expression that showed better OS with pembrolizumab (Table). In multivariable cox analysis, adjusting for TMB and PD-L1, CXCL9 [HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.54-0.83)] and CXCL10 [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.64-0.97)] remained independent predictors of pembrolizumab benefit, all p<0.05 . Conclusions: In this large real-world study, PD-L1 but not TMB predicted pembrolizumab benefit in TNBC. CXCL9 / 10-high define an immune-active TME and are independent predictors of pembrolizumab response. When integrated with PD-L1 and TMB, these chemokines help identify additional patients with TNBC who may derive benefit from pembrolizumab, supporting their inclusion as biomarkers in prospective studies. PD-L1 Chemokine CXCL9 mOS (in months) (95% CI) p CXCL10 mOS (in months) (95% CI) p + High 25.7 (22.1 - 32.1) <0.01 25.7 (22.2 - 34.1) <0.01 – High 26.9 (17.8 - 39.2) 21.7 (17.5 - 28.2) + Low 18.5 (11.9 - NR) 20.7 (13.3 - 30.1) – Low 15.8 (12.2 - 19.2) 16.7 (13.1 - 21.5) TMB Low High 25.0 (22.1 - 30.1) <0.01 23.7 (20.9 - 28.2) <0.01 High High 20.6 (17.5 -37.1) 19.5 (16.3 - NR) Low Low 18.3 (14.1 - 21.3) 18.6 (15.7 - 22.2) High Low 6.6 (3.6 - 13.7) 7.6 (5.1 - 16.2)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1125-1125
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

S

Shipra Gandhi

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

S

Sachin Kumar Deshmukh

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

M

Madison T. Canning

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

D

Dario Trapani

S

Sharon Wu

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

J

Jose Pablo Leone

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

K

Kevin Kalinsky

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta

E

Evanthia T. Roussos Torres

S

Sunil S. Badve

M

Mayukhmala Jana

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

A

Anant Madabhushi

S

Sahar Almahfouz

Emory University, Atlanta, GA

H

Hilmi Al-Shakshir

Emory University, Atlanta, GA

M

Maryam B. Lustberg

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

K

Kazuaki Takabe

G

Giuseppe Curigliano

G

George W. Sledge

P

Pawel Kalinski