Real-world impact of matched targeted therapy on survival in advanced biliary tract cancer: An international collaborative study.

B Binbin Zheng-Lin (Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR) C Celine Hoyek (Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) H Heidi E. Kosiorek (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ) O Oluseyi Abidoye (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) C Cody Eslinger (Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) M Mohamad Bassam Sonbol C Christina Wu (Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) N Nguyen H. Tran (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) H Hani M. Babiker (Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) L Lewis R. Roberts T Takayuki Yoshino (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) M Masafumi Ikeda C Chigusa Morizane H Hideaki Bando Y Yoshiaki Nakamura T Takao Fujisawa D Daniel H. Ahn (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) M Mitesh J. Borad (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) T Taro Shibuki T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

Abstract

536 Background: The prognosis of advanced BTC remains poor. Although targeted agents have expanded late-line options, many patients (pts) become ineligible for these therapies after progressing on first-line treatment. Herein, we examined the real-world impact of targeted therapy on survival in advanced BTC. Methods: In this international collaborative study between the Mayo Clinic (US) and the National Cancer Center East (Japan), we included pts with advanced BTC with comprehensive tumor molecular profiling who had received at least 30 days of systemic therapy. Pts were categorized into 3 groups: 1) non-actionable, 2) pts with alterations who received matched targeted therapy at any point during their treatment (matched group), and 3) those with mutations who did not receive matched therapy (unmatched group). OS was calculated from the start date of first-line therapy until death and compared among three subgroups using Cox regression models. Results: Of 932 pts, 366 (39.3%) had an actionable alteration, and 135 of these received matched therapy. 566 (61.7%) did not have an actionable alteration (Table). The most common alterations were somatic BRCA1/2 (N=106, 11.4%), HER2 amplification (N=65, 7%), FGFR2 fusion (N=61, 6.5%), KRAS G12C/D (N=46, 4.9%), and IDH1 (N=38, 4.1%). 78.7% of FGFR2 fusions were found in Caucasian pts, whereas BRCA1/2 (97.5%), HER2 (78.5%), and KRAS G12C/D (67.4%) alterations were more prevalent in Asian pts. The median OS was significantly longer in the matched group (21.4 months; 95% CI 18.4-27.9) compared to the unmatched group (14.6 months; 95% CI 12.8-17.6) and the non-actionable group (17.2 months; 95% CI 15.5-19.0). The 36-month OS rate was 33% in the matched group vs. 7% in the unmatched group (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, gender, prior surgical resection, primary tumor location, and country of origin, matched targeted therapy remained a strong independent predictor for improved OS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.79). Conclusions: These real-world findings suggest that matched targeted therapies significantly improve survival in advanced BTC, underscoring the need to incorporate them earlier in the treatment course and address barriers to treatment access. The regional prevalence of actionable alterations should also be considered when developing new targeted therapies. Patient baseline characteristics stratified by actionable alterations and targeted therapy. Non-actionable(N=566) Unmatched group(N=231) Matched group(N=135) Site, n (%) Japan 409 (72%) 166 (72%) 50 (37%) US 157 (28%) 65 (28%) 85 (63%) Age at Dx > 65, n (%) 324 (57%) 122 (53%) 54 (40%) Female, n (%) 235 (42%) 92 (40%) 77 (57%) Primary tumor location (category), n (%) Intrahepatic 217 (43%) 115 (55%) 99 (76%) Extrahepatic 150 (30%) 39 (19%) 17 (13%) Gallbladder 142 (28%) 54 (26%) 14 (11%) Prior surgical resection, n (%) 220 (42%) 74 (34%) 48 (37%)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 536-536
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

B

Binbin Zheng-Lin

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR

C

Celine Hoyek

Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

H

Heidi E. Kosiorek

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

O

Oluseyi Abidoye

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

C

Cody Eslinger

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

M

Mohamad Bassam Sonbol

C

Christina Wu

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

N

Nguyen H. Tran

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

H

Hani M. Babiker

Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

L

Lewis R. Roberts

T

Takayuki Yoshino

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

M

Masafumi Ikeda

C

Chigusa Morizane

H

Hideaki Bando

Y

Yoshiaki Nakamura

T

Takao Fujisawa

D

Daniel H. Ahn

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

M

Mitesh J. Borad

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

T

Taro Shibuki

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab