Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations as first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Abstract
e16510 Background: The management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has evolved significantly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, limited real-world data exist comparing the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N/I) with ICI plus TKI (IO/TKI) combinations. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and other efficacy parameters for these regimens in patients with mccRCC treated at tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with mccRCC treated with first-line N/I or IO/TKI between 2018 and 2022. Eligible patients had confirmed clear cell histology, were treatment-naïve, and received first-line ICIs. Patient demographics, IMDC risk groups, treatment regimens, and efficacy outcomes were analyzed. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting outcomes. Results: A total of 99 patients were included, with 33 receiving N/I and 66 receiving IO/TKI. Patients in the IO/TKI group had a higher proportion of Furhman grade 3–4 tumors (47% vs. 30%) and prior nephrectomy (53% vs. 39%), while more patients in the N/I group presented with N1 disease (33% vs. 17%) and de novo metastatic disease (82% vs. 68%). Median PFS for the overall cohort was 16 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.4); PFS was significantly longer in the IO/TKI group (21.36 months, 95% CI: 13.08–29.63) compared to the N/I group (10.49 months, 95% CI: 1.60–19.29; p = 0.03). OS was not reached in either group, with 3-year OS rates of 57% (95% CI: 34–74%) for N/I and 67% (95% CI: 19–77%) for IO/TKI (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis showed that IO/TKI use (p = 0.03) and lymphocyte-to-platelet (L/P) ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.003) were independently associated with improved PFS, while pure clear cell histology (p = 0.04), L/P ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.006), and absence of bone metastasis (p = 0.02) were associated with improved OS. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, IO/TKI combinations demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared to N/I, with comparable OS outcomes. The findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment selection based on patient characteristics, including disease presentation, risk stratification, and tumor features.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Faisal Azam
King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Mubarak Mahdi Almansour
King Abdulaziz Medical City (NGHA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Bassam Mohammed Basulaiman
King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Mohamed Aseafan
Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Mahmoud Abdelsatar Elshenawy
Medical Oncology Department, Cancer Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Tusneem Elhassan
2Adult Hematology, stem cell transplant and cellular therapy section, Cancer Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ali Mustafa Sheikh
Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Shouki Bazarbashi
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia