Real-world outcomes of radium-223 in the FRONTIER study: Impact of prior up-front therapy in mCRPC.
Abstract
63 Background: The role of Radium-223 (Ra-223) after up-front therapies for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) remains unclear. Given their widespread adoption, assessing the impact on Ra-223 outcomes is clinically important. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the FRONTIER database of mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 at 84 Japanese institutions (2020–2023). Of 844 cases, 591 met eligibility criteria. Patients were grouped as: up-front therapy with docetaxel and/or ARSI (n=189) or ADT monotherapy (n=402). After multiple imputation and 1:1 propensity score matching, 377 patients were analyzed (189 vs. 188). Primary endpoints were OS and CSS; secondary endpoints included time to progression, treatment completion, radiologic response, pain non-deterioration, and skeletal events. Results: After matching, baseline features were well balanced. Six-cycle completion rates were similar (73.0% up-front vs. 68.1% ADT). Median time to progression was 5 months in both groups (p=0.9), with comparable radiologic response and pain outcomes. Disease progression was detected more frequently in the up-front group (86.8% vs. 77.1%, p=0.01). Among patients completing six cycles, median OS did not significantly differ (67 vs. 70 months, HR=0.97, p=0.87). CSS was also similar. Absence of bone-modifying agents was associated with a tripled SSE risk in the up-front group. Conclusions: Ra-223 demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety regardless of prior up-front therapy. Survival was not compromised, supporting its use after treatment intensification and underscoring the need for bone-modifying agents to prevent SSE. Treatment response and progression outcomes after radium-223. Variable Up front therapy(n=189) Vintage hormone therapy(n=188) p-value Radiographic treatment response to Ra-223 Complete response 7/159 (4.4%) 3/147 (2.0%) Partial Response 23/159 (14.5%) 13/147 (8.8%) Stable Disease 58/159 (36.5%) 74/147 (50.3%) Progressive Disease 71/159 (44.7%) 57/147 (38.8%) Not evaluable/Unknown 30 41 Overall distribution across CR/PR/SD/PD χ² p=0.06 Objective response rate (CR+PR) 30/159 (18.9%) 16/147 (10.9%) 0.07 Progression status at data cut-off Progressed 164/189 (86.8%) 145/188 (77.1%) χ² p=0.01 Not progressed (censored at cut-off) 25/189 (15.7%) 43/188 (22.9%) Progression-free survival from Ra-223 initiation (months) 5 ( 4-8 ) 5 ( 4-8 ) 0.9 Values are n (%) or median (IQR). Radiographic responses (CR/PR/SD/PD) are among evaluable patients; χ² for distribution; ORR=CR+PR (2×2; Fisher if needed). Progression status is descriptive; PFS by KM/log-rank and Cox. Reasons for PD: n/N (%) among progressed (164/145), multiple responses; 2×2 χ² except Other (Fisher); no multiplicity adjustment.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Takuma Kato
Kohei Hashimoto
Atsushi Mizokami
Shinsuke Kurokawa
Sano Kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan
Shingo Sugaya
Machida Municipal Hospital, Machida, Japan
Hirofumi Morinaka
Kawasaki Medical School Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
Katsuyoshi Hashine
Toshiyuki Kamoto
University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan
Ryoichi Imamura
Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
Atsushi Kyan
Shirakawa Kosei General Hospital, Shirakawa, Japan
Yusuke Ito
Takashi Kobayashi
Takashi Kawahara
Yoichiro Tohi
Kagawa University, Kita-Gun, Japan
Mikio Sugimoto
Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan