Real-world outcomes of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC): A retrospective multicenter analysis from Peru.
Abstract
e23433 Background: Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) outcomes in Latin America remain poorly characterized. Although incidence rates are lower than in Western countries, the disease is frequently diagnosed at advanced, muscle-invasive stages, and management is often affected by delayed diagnosis and limited access to specialized care. Real-world data describing survival outcomes and treatment patterns in Latin America (LATAM) are scarce. This study assessed real-world outcomes in a multicenter cohort of UBC patients from Peru. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study including Peruvian patients with UBC treated at 6 institutions from 2015-2025. Recurrence- free survival (RFS, assessed among patients undergoing definitive surgery until first recurrence) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. A level of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Cox proportional hazards models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: 215 patients were included; median age was 71 years and 72% were male. Clinical stage distribution was as follows: stage I 19%, stage II 16%, stage III 46%, stage IVA 4%, and stage IVB 15%. Smoking history was documented in 8% of patients. 72% were muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Regarding medical treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 10.7% of patients. Surgery was performed in 40.0% (n = 84), 5 recurrences (6%) were documented. Median follow-up for RFS was 23 months (1–80). 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 95%, 88%, and 88%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 62%, 39%, and 30%, respectively (median OS of 21 months). OS differed significantly according to multiple clinical characteristics, including histologic grade (p = 0.016), TNM classification (p < 0.001) and receipt of surgery (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, compared with stage I-II, stages III (HR 4.31, 2.25-8.24, p < 0.001) and IVB (HR 4.26, 2.07-8.77, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of mortality. OS was longer among patients who underwent surgery (median 42 vs 12 months, p = 0.001). No significant OS differences were observed according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy use, likely reflecting the limited number of treated patients. Conclusions: This study provides valuable real-world data on outcomes in patients with urothelial bladder cancer treated at multiple centers in Peru. Clinical stage at diagnosis was the primary determinant of overall survival; a high proportion presented with advanced stage (III-IV), likely contributing to short OS. The low utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy underscores important gaps between guideline recommendations and real-world practice, highlighting areas of unmet need and opportunities to improve access to curative-intent treatment in resource-limited settings.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Patricia Rioja
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
Paola Yepez Lugo
Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas del Sur, Arequipa, Peru
Guillermo Valencia
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
Wendy Alvarez
Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Centro (IREN), Junin, Junin, Peru
Sandy Carmona Lozano
Hospital Santa Rosa, Lima, Peru
Jianmartin Anderson Galecio Viera
Hospital de Apoyo II-2 Sullana, Piura, Peru
Elica Margarita Garcia Leon
Hospital Regional Lambayeque, Chiclayo, Peru
Eduardo Augusto Paz Cornejo
Clinica Oncosalud, Lima, Peru
Connie Antoinette Rabanal Carretero
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
Zaida Morante
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
Tatiana Vidaurre
2Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
Silvia P. Neciosup
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru