Real-world utilization of tissue-free ctDNA monitoring in patients with prostate cancer.

Abstract

98 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring provides an additional clinical tool for assessing treatment response and emerging resistance. We evaluated the real-world (RW) use and results of FoundationOne Monitor (F1Monitor), a tissue-free ctDNA monitoring assay, in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: The clinical laboratory developed test, F1Monitor, was available to physicians in a limited pilot with full discretion of test eligibility, timing, and frequency. Therapy type was a non-mandatory field on the order form. CtDNA was detected and quantified by ctDNA tumor fraction (TF); variants were tracked with variant allele frequency (VAF), and the origin [tumor somatic (TS), germline, or clonal hematopoiesis (CH)] was predicted algorithmically. Results: F1Monitor was ordered by 28 physicians for 215 pts with PCa. Therapy data were known for 156 pts: ADT+ androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI, N = 69/156 pts, 44%), ADT alone (N = 32, 21%), ADT + chemotherapy (chemo, N = 20,13%), ADT + radioligand therapy (RLT, N = 17, 11%), and others (N = 18). Median follow-up was 188 days. Longitudinal testing (≥2 tests) occurred in 64 pts, often (N = 37) when the first test was ctDNA TF positive (+). Median cadence for serial testing (≥3 tests, N = 31) was 42 days (IQR: 35, 59). ctDNA TF was + at any timepoint in 50% (107/215) of pts overall and 53% (82/156) of pts known to be on therapy, trending higher in pts on ADT+chemo (80%) and ADT+RLT (65%). Median and maximum ctDNA TF values were 11% (IQR: 0.9,37.8%) and 89% respectively. Lowest ctDNA TF and reportable TS VAF quantified were 0.13% and 0.04%, respectively. ctDNA TF longitudinal changes were observed in 67% (43/64) of pts: 92% of pts on ADT+chemo, 69% on ADT+RLT, 59% on ADT+ARPI, and 38% of pts on ADT alone. Among pts with ≥2 tests, 39% (25/64) had ctDNA TF increase, including 6/27 (22%) pts that were ctDNA TF negative (-) on the first test. Of pts with ≥2 tests and any ctDNA TF+ result, 35% cleared ctDNA TF in later tests. 33% of pts were persistently ctDNA TF -. Each test reported an average of 5 alterations: ~2 TS short variants, copy number variants, or rearrangements, and ~2 predicted CH variants. HRR variants were detected in 37% (80/215) of pts (31 with ≥2 tests) : persistent in 20 pts, cleared in 7, and newly emerging in 14. At least 50% of alterations in CHEK2 and ATM were predicted CH. Alterations in PI3K pathway genes were detected in 20% (43/215) of pts: (16 with ≥2 tests) persistent in 6 pts, cleared in 5, and newly emerging in 5. Conclusions: In this RW pilot of tissue-free ctDNA monitoring in PCa, F1Monitor demonstrated high sensitivity in clinical practice, detecting ctDNA TF as low as 0.13% and TS VAF as low as 0.04% while distinguishing tumor-derived from predicted CH variants. Importantly, ctDNA TF was + in 53% of pts while on therapy with observed longitudinal changes for 67% of pts, supporting potential utility of ctDNA for monitoring treatment response and emerging resistance.