Redefining the use of a first-line FOLFIRINOX-like regimen in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Updated analysis.

A Arthur Winer (Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) D Dina Ioffe (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA) K Karen Ruth (1Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Hospital System, Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States) E Eric A. Ross (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) K Katrina Bynum (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) E Eli Mikkelsen (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) R Rosanna Veggeberg (Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA) I Igor A. Astsaturov (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) C Christopher G. Cann (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) N Namrata Vijayvergia (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia) V Vanessa Wookey (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) T Timothy Lewis Cannon (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) R Raymond Couric Wadlow (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) J Jasmine Huynh (University of California San Francisco, Freemont, CA) Y Yoomi Lee (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Alexandria, VA) E Efrat Dotan (17University of Pennsylvania, Lancaster, United States)

Abstract

700 Background: Prospective elderly-specific data for treating pancreatic cancer are scarce. First-line treatment with triplet chemotherapy (e.g., FOLFIRINOX) is often too toxic for older adults (OA). Interim analysis of this multicenter phase II trial evaluating the tolerability and efficacy of alternating FOLFOX and FOLFIRI (aFOLFIRINOX) in OA with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) indicated safety of the regimen. We now report updated study results including safety and survival endpoints. Methods: Eligible patients (n=37) ≥65 years old with measurable untreated mPDAC, ECOG PS 0-2, receive standard doses of FOLFOX alternating with FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to 6 months. Patients (pts) could continue treatment thereafter at the discretion of their physician. The primary endpoint was rate of treatment-limiting grade ≥3 adverse events (TLAE) per CTCAE v5.0 in the first 8 weeks of therapy. TLAE were defined as treatment-related grade 3 non-hematologic AE persisting > 2 weeks despite best supportive care, grade 3 anemia or thrombocytopenia, grade >3 neuropathy, any grade > 4 AE, or AE requiring treatment discontinuation. The study was powered to detect a 20% improvement in TLAE compared to FOLFIRINOX. Secondary endpoints included progression free & overall survival (PFS & OS), objective response rate (ORR). FACT-G and PROMIS-10 quality of life (QOL) surveys and geriatric assessments (GA) were collected. Results: 37 eligible pts enrolled: 19 male, 18 female; median age 75 (range 65-82); 31 pts had ECOG PS 0-1. The pre-specified primary endpoint was met - 24 pts (65%, 95% CI: 47%-80%) did not experience TLAE as defined above. 4 of 28 pts (14%) who received at least 1 full cycle of treatment had a TLAE, whereas 9 of 9 patients (100%) who received <2 cycles had a TLAE (p<0.001); 8 of those 9 pts were not evaluable for response. TLAE (e.g., neutropenia, anemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia) were similar to AE reported with FOLFIRINOX or were disease-related (elevated bilirubin, pulmonary embolism). Of 29 pts evaluable for response, ORR was 14% (PR: n =4), disease control rate was 86% (SD: n =21). 12 pts (32.4%) completed 6 months of study treatment. Median PFS 6 mo, OS 8.9 mo. Emotional well-being improved over time (p=0.002); other QOL and mental health scores were stable over time. GA data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: OA with mPDAC treated with first-line aFOLFIRINOX did not experience excess or unexpected TLAE, and the alternating regimen was overall significantly less toxic. Enrolled pts were older than the average clinical trial pt but importantly tolerated treatment well with preserved QOL. This study demonstrates tolerability of aFOLFIRINOX with similar outcomes to historical data, suggesting this is a reasonable treatment option in this vulnerable patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT05360732 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 700-700
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

A

Arthur Winer

Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

D

Dina Ioffe

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA

K

Karen Ruth

1Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Hospital System, Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States

E

Eric A. Ross

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

K

Katrina Bynum

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

E

Eli Mikkelsen

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

R

Rosanna Veggeberg

Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA

I

Igor A. Astsaturov

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

C

Christopher G. Cann

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

N

Namrata Vijayvergia

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia

V

Vanessa Wookey

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

T

Timothy Lewis Cannon

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

R

Raymond Couric Wadlow

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

J

Jasmine Huynh

University of California San Francisco, Freemont, CA

Y

Yoomi Lee

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Alexandria, VA

E

Efrat Dotan

17University of Pennsylvania, Lancaster, United States