Reproducibility and clinical concordance of a tumor-informed MRD assay in patients with resected colorectal cancer from the DYNAMIC trials.

J Jeanne Tie (Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research) H Hillary S. Sloane (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) M Maria Clark (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) T Thomas P. Slavin (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) J Jeremy Kaplan (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) R Robyn T. Sussman (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) H Hannah Quinn (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) K Kimberly Schmitt (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) L Lisa Dobbyn (Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) M Matthew Chapman R Roslynn Stirzaker (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia) M Marlyse Debrincat (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia) R Robert Querfurth (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) F Frank Holtrup (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) D Daniel L. Edelstein (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) P Peter Gibbs (Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research)

Abstract

26 Background: Haystack MRD is a highly accurate, tumor-informed ctDNA assay designed for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection. To evaluate clinical performance and inter-laboratory reproducibility, retrospective testing of samples from early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients enrolled in the randomized DYNAMIC and DYNAMIC-III trials was performed. Methods: Residual specimens from 59 patients (51 stage II, 8 stage III CRC) with annotated clinical outcomes were analyzed using the CLIA-validated Haystack MRD assay, which targets up to 50 tumor-informed, patient-specific variants derived from whole-exome sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA. Testing was performed on 60 cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from 59 unique patients, containing a median of 3,800 genomic equivalents from plasma collected post-operatively (n=40) and post-adjuvant chemotherapy (n=20). Concordance of MRD results with clinical recurrence was assessed. Orthogonal validation was also conducted to evaluate reproducibility across two independent CLIA-certified laboratories: Quest Diagnostics Oncology Center of Excellence (Lewisville, TX) and Haystack Oncology (Baltimore, MD). Results: All 60 samples tested with Haystack MRD in parallel at the two sites yielded concordant MRD results (100% agreement). MRD positivity was observed in 10 of 12 samples from patients who experienced clinical recurrence, while 48 samples from patients who remained recurrence-free tested MRD-negative (sensitivity: 83%; specificity: 100%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 100%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 96%). Quantitative ctDNA measurements were between 0.32 (min) and 316.21 (max) mean ctDNA molecules/ml and were highly correlated across sites (Pearson correlation coefficient = 1.000; p<0.0001), supporting strong inter-laboratory reproducibility. Additional testing is ongoing. Conclusions: This study provides both clinical and orthogonal validation of the Haystack MRD assay using well-characterized specimens from the DYNAMIC trials. Results demonstrate high concordance with clinical recurrence outcomes and reproducibility across independent laboratories. These findings support the use of Haystack MRD as a robust approach for MRD detection following curative-intent treatment in stage II/III CRC, with potential to guide adjuvant therapy decisions and enable proactive, ctDNA-informed monitoring.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 26-26
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

J

Jeanne Tie

Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

H

Hillary S. Sloane

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

M

Maria Clark

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

T

Thomas P. Slavin

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

J

Jeremy Kaplan

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

R

Robyn T. Sussman

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

H

Hannah Quinn

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

K

Kimberly Schmitt

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

L

Lisa Dobbyn

Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

M

Matthew Chapman

R

Roslynn Stirzaker

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia

M

Marlyse Debrincat

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia

R

Robert Querfurth

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

F

Frank Holtrup

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

D

Daniel L. Edelstein

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

P

Peter Gibbs

Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research