Results from the prior treatment cohort of a phase I/II study of nivolumab and axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Abstract
548 Background: Combination tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) are an established standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We report updated analysis of a multi-center, investigator-initiated (IIT), phase I/II study of axitinib (axi) with nivolumab (nivo) in the previously treated patient cohort. Methods: The study investigated the combination of axi/nivo in an initial dose finding phase I portion and a phase II portion including 2 parallel arms: treatment naïve mRCC patients and mRCC patients previously treated with TKIs or IO/IO combination (NCT03172754). We are presenting final results from the previously treated cohort. Included patients had pathology with any clear cell component, ECOG performance status of 0-1, no known or symptomatic brain metastases, and no history of autoimmune disease. The recommended phase 2 dose of axi was 5 mg BID and patients were treated for up to 2 years then could stop one or both therapies. The primary endpoint of the phase II portion was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator assessment. Results: Twenty-six patients were accrued to the previously treated arm, all evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The median age was 62 yrs (range: 42-81), 80.8% were male and 88.5% were white. Twenty pts had 1 prior line of therapy (18 TKI alone), 6 pts had 2 or more prior lines of Tx. Two pts had prior nivo with ipilimumab. Median follow-up was 47.2 months. The ORR was 30.8% (all PRs) and 57.7% achieved stable disease. The primary PD rate was 11.5%. Median OS was 48.4 months and median PFS was 13.0 months. Six pts (23.1%) completed two years of Tx on trial and elected to stop one or both drugs (2 elected to stay on axi alone). Five pts remain progression-free and have received no subsequent therapy with a median progression-free interval of 23.2 months. None had received prior IO. Adverse event (AE) data was similar to published data for IO/TKI combinations. There was one Gr4 TRAE of elevated lipase and 12 pts (46%) experienced a Gr3 TRAE. One pt (4%) discontinued the study due to TRAEs. Conclusions: Final results from the previously treated cohort of this IIT of axi/nivo for pts with mRCC demonstrated an ORR of 30.8% and a DCR of 88.5% with no unexpected AEs. Though there were no CRs, disease control rate and median OS were encouraging in this previously treated population. This is the only reported IO/TKI trial that allowed for stopping of all Tx at 2 years, with 6 pts (23.1%) meeting this milestone, 5 of whom (19% of all pts) remain progression-free for a median period close to 2 years. Clinical trial information: NCT03172754 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Matthew R. Zibelman
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Yasser Ged
Michael A Carducci
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Ana M. Molina
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Rahul Ravilla
New York Oncology Hematology, Albany, NY
Rachel Basiura
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Courtney Lambert
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Madeline Wargins
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Erika Jerome
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Eli Mikkelsen
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Karthik Devarajan
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Karen J Ruth
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Rutika Kokate
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Fern Anari
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Pooja Ghatalia
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Daniel M. Geynisman
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Elizabeth R. Plimack
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA