Results of a phase 2 trial of ramucirumab plus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (HGCSG 1903).

K Kentaro Sawada (Department of Medical Oncology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan) Y Yasuyuki Kawamoto K Kazuaki Harada (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan) T Takayuki Ando S Susumu Sogabe (Department of Medical Oncology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan) Y Yoshimitsu Kobayashi M Masayoshi Dazai (Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan) M Michio Nakamura (Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan) K Kazuteru Hatanaka (Department of Gastroenterology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan) A Atsushi Ishiguro A Atsushi Sato S Shintaro Nakano Y Yoshiaki Shindo (Department of Surgery, Nakadori General Hospital, Akita, Japan) A Ayumu Hosokawa K Ken Ito (Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo-Shi, Japan) A Ayumu Yoshikawa (Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Japan) K Kayoko Iuchi (Data Center, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group, Sapporo, Japan) I Isao Yokota (Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan) S Satoshi Yuki Y Yoshito Komatsu

Abstract

447 Background: Ramucirumab (RAM) has shown efficacy in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the efficacy and safety regarding the combination therapy of RAM and docetaxel (DTX) have not been reported. We hypothesized that RAM plus DTX for patients with AGC could be as effective as RAM plus PTX and could reduce the incidence of neuropathy. Methods: HGCSG 1903 was a non-randomized, single arm, phase 2 trial carried out at 20 institutes in Japan. AGC patients with refractory or intolerance to primary chemotherapy were eligible. RAM (8 mg/kg on day1 and 15) plus DTX (60 mg/m 2 on day1) combination therapy administered in 28-day cycle were continued until disease progression or emergence of adverse events requiring discontinuation. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) with threshold value of 10.7% and an expected value of 27.9%. A total of 35 cases are planned for registration. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. This trial was registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, number jRCTs011200010. Results: Between Nov 2020 and Dec 2023, 36 patients were enrolled. Median age was 70 (range, 36–82); female/male were 7/29; ECOG PS 0/1, 16/20, respectively. One patient did not initiate study treatment at the onset of bowel obstruction after enrollment. In the efficacy and safety analysis set of 35 patients, RR was 25.7% (95%C.I., 12.5–43.3%) and disease control rate was 74.3% (95%C.I., 56.7–87.5%). Median OS and PFS were 11.9 months (95%C.I., 3.0–20.7) and 3.1 months (95%C.I., 2.1–4.2), respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (68.6%), leucopenia (57.1%), febrile neutropenia (17.1%), hypertension (14.3%), anorexia (11.4%), anemia (8.6%), and fatigue (5.7%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 60.0% of patients. The protocol was amended to allow primary G-CSF prophylaxis during study period. The number of patients who received primary G-CSF prophylaxis after the amendment was 7/13 (53.8%). Neuropathy occurred in 65.7% of all grades, with no incidence of grade 3 or higher. No death and new safety signals with a causal relation to study treatment were observed. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of response rate was met in HGCSG 1903. Although neutropenia and febrile neutropenia may be more frequent, they were manageable. RAM plus DTX might be considered as an option for second-line treatment of patients with AGC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs011200010.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 447-447
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

K

Kentaro Sawada

Department of Medical Oncology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan

Y

Yasuyuki Kawamoto

K

Kazuaki Harada

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

T

Takayuki Ando

S

Susumu Sogabe

Department of Medical Oncology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan

Y

Yoshimitsu Kobayashi

M

Masayoshi Dazai

Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan

M

Michio Nakamura

Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

K

Kazuteru Hatanaka

Department of Gastroenterology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan

A

Atsushi Ishiguro

A

Atsushi Sato

S

Shintaro Nakano

Y

Yoshiaki Shindo

Department of Surgery, Nakadori General Hospital, Akita, Japan

A

Ayumu Hosokawa

K

Ken Ito

Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo-Shi, Japan

A

Ayumu Yoshikawa

Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Japan

K

Kayoko Iuchi

Data Center, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group, Sapporo, Japan

I

Isao Yokota

Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

S

Satoshi Yuki

Y

Yoshito Komatsu