Results of a phase I study of alpelisib and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

P Priyanka Sharma J Jaimie Heldstab (University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS) R Rachel Yoder (The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) J Joshua Michael Staley (The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) I India Fernandez (University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS) A Adam Heinrich (University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS) C Chasity Cupp (The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) H Hope Owens (University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS) B Brent Sear (University of Kansas Medical Center, Fairway, KS) S Spencer Beaman (University of Kansas Medical Center, Fairway, KS) S Scott James Weir (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) A Anne O'Dea (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) A Andrew K. Godwin S Shane R. Stecklein (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS) Q Qamar J. Khan

Abstract

1094 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (TROP2-directed antibody drug conjugate, ADC) is effective in treatment of pretreated HER2-negative MBC. PI3K is the most frequently altered pathway in breast cancer. This phase I trial investigated the combination of SG plus alpelisib (oral α-specific PI3K inhibitor) in HER2-negative MBC. Methods: Eligible patients had HER2-negative MBC and had received ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy in the advanced or neo/adjuvant setting and had not received prior PI3K/AKT inhibitor. The study was 3+3 dose escalation design: dose level 1: alpelisib 250 mg+SG 8 mg/kg; dose level 2: alpelisib 250 mg+SG 10 mg/kg; dose level 3: alpelisib 300 mg+SG 10 mg/kg. Alpelisib was dosed PO daily and SG IV, D1 and 8 every 21 days. Antidiarrheal prophylaxis was utilized for the first two cycles. Primary endpoint was recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional endpoints included adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and pharmacokinetics. Results: 12 patients were enrolled between 2022-2024 (dose level 1: N = 3, dose level 2: N = 6, dose level 3: N = 3). 7/12 (58%) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 5/12 (42%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. All patients had visceral disease. 8/12 (67%) had ≥1 prior metastatic chemotherapy; 4/12 (33%) had prior immunotherapy; 3/12 (25%) had prior ADC. One dose-limiting toxicity (hyperbilirubinemia) was observed at dose level 2. RP2D was alpelisib 300 mg + SG 10 mg/kg. The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were electrolyte imbalance (G3 17%, G4 17%), neutropenia (G3 33%, G4 0%), diarrhea (G3 17%, G4 0%), and hyperglycemia (G3 8%, G4 8%). There were no G5 AEs. Pharmacokinetics of SG and its metabolites were consistent with previous reports. Among 11 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 36% (4/11) (complete response [CR] = 1, partial response [PR] = 3) and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + stable disease > 24 weeks) was 64% (7/11). ORR in TNBC was 50% and in HR-positive disease was 20%. Among patients with prior ADC, ORR was 33% and clinical benefit rate was 67%. Three of four patients with ORR had response lasting > 6 months, with median duration of response of 14.9 (range 3.2 to 28.1) months. Median PFS was 5.7 months. Tumor and serial ctDNA analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: Combination of SG + alpelisib was feasible, with manageable side effects. The toxicity profile of the combination was consistent with the known safety profiles of the two agents. This combination demonstrated encouraging efficacy in HER2-negative MBC, with prolonged duration of responses, and warrants further evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05143229 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1094-1094
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

P

Priyanka Sharma

J

Jaimie Heldstab

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

R

Rachel Yoder

The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

J

Joshua Michael Staley

The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

I

India Fernandez

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

A

Adam Heinrich

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

C

Chasity Cupp

The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

H

Hope Owens

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

B

Brent Sear

University of Kansas Medical Center, Fairway, KS

S

Spencer Beaman

University of Kansas Medical Center, Fairway, KS

S

Scott James Weir

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

A

Anne O'Dea

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

A

Andrew K. Godwin

S

Shane R. Stecklein

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS

Q

Qamar J. Khan