Retrospective analysis of HAIP therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors.

M Matthew Sawyer (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) A Amy Little Jones (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) A Anna Moscowitz (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) T Timothy J. Brown (Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) R Radhika Kainthla S Salwan Al Matar (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) S Syed Mohammad Ali Kazmi N Nilesh Verma

Abstract

126 Background: HAIP (hepatic arterial infusion pump) therapy is a promising intervention for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver metastases, addressing significant challenges in management and prognosis. It offers targeted treatment to maximize efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. We present a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with HAIP therapy at an academic center and safety net hospital. Methods: Patients with mCRC and hepatic metastasis who received at least one HAIP floxuridine (FUDR) cycle from 2013 to 2023 were included. Baseline data, including demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment history, were collected pre-HAIP. The main outcome was overall survival (OS) post-pump placement, with secondary outcomes being real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and HAIP-related complications. Results: In total, 88 patients were evaluated for inclusion, of whom 63 met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of included patients was 46 years (interquartile range (IQR) 41-57) and 54% were male. Prior to HAIP, 38 (60%) of patients received one line of systemic therapy, while 18 (29%) had two. The median OS from HAIP placement was 28.0 months (95% CI 21.9-NR) and median rwPFS was 11.2 months (95% CI 7.1-16.1). Baseline bilirubin, KRAS mutant status, and CEA were associated with OS in the multivariate cox model. The most common complication from HAIP placement was hematoma (n=4, 6.3%), followed by pump infection (n=2, 3.2%). Grade 3 toxicities from FUDR infusion were infrequent, involving alkaline phosphatase (n=6), AST or ALT elevation (n=3), bilirubin increase (n=2), and platelet count decrease (n=1). Conclusions: HAIP treatment is associated with durable responses and few complications, making it well-tolerated by patients. For individuals with colorectal cancer and hepatic metastases, HAIP chemotherapy using FUDR presents a viable and effective treatment option, potentially improving overall outcomes and quality of life. Further prospective and randomized work may establish the role for HAIP in mCRC with liver metastases.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 126-126
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

M

Matthew Sawyer

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

A

Amy Little Jones

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

A

Anna Moscowitz

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

T

Timothy J. Brown

Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

R

Radhika Kainthla

S

Salwan Al Matar

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

S

Syed Mohammad Ali Kazmi

N

Nilesh Verma