Safety and dosimetry of <sup>177</sup> Lu-rosopatamab tetraxetanplus SoC in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Preliminary results from part 1 of phase 3 ProstACT Global study.
Abstract
LBA5009 Background: ProstACT Global is a Phase 3 study of 177 Lu-rosopatamab + standard of care (SoC) for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We present preliminary safety, dosimetry, & pharmacokinetics results from Part 1 (Lead-In). Methods: Eligible pts had PSMA+ mCRPC (confirmed on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) with disease progression on ≥12w prior therapy on their 1 st androgen receptor pathway inhibitor in metastatic castration-sensitive PCa, non-mCRPC, or mCRPC setting. Pts may have received docetaxel in mCSPC setting if ≥6 months prior. Pts received 2 single IV injections 177 Lu-rosopatamab (76 mCi each), 14d apart, with assigned SoC (Cohort 1, +abiraterone; Cohort 2, +enzalutamide; Cohort 3, followed by docetaxel; planned n=10 each). Pts were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; onset on or after initiation of study treatment). Pts underwent serial SPECT/CT imaging after 1 77 Lu-rosopatamab administration (4, 24, 96, 168, 360h) for dosimetry & blood sampling for pharmacokinetics (PK). Co-primary endpoints were safety & dosimetry of 177 Lu-rosopatamab + SoC. Analyses were preplanned, descriptive, & overseen by IDMC. No formal statistics were performed. Dosimetry & biodistribution were evaluated using observed values without formal hypothesis testing. Results: Data from 36 pts (baseline median PSA: 18.18 ng/mL) who received any study treatment was included (Cohorts 1, 2, 3: n=11, 11, 14, resp.). 55.6% pts had Gleason score 8-10, 72% pts were 2L mCRPC, & 25% pts had previous taxane exposure. No new safety signals were identified; TEAEs were predominantly transient & manageable hematologic events. Hematologic TEAEs (% pts any grade; Grade ≥3) included thrombocytopenia (77.8%; 44.4%), neutropenia (63.9%; 47.2%), & lymphopenia (55.6%;41.7%). Non-hematologic TEAEs were all Grade ≤2, except for 1 Grade 3 dizziness. Fatigue (19 events) was most common. Only 9 xerostomia events reported (all Grade 1). No Grade 5 treatment-related TEAEs reported. Blood activity concentration over time demonstrated bi-exponential clearance kinetics. Liver received highest absorbed radiation (range, 1.62-5.08 mGy/MBq), with lower doses received by kidneys (0.336-0.961 mGy/MBq) & salivary glands (0.001-0.104 mGy/MBq). Lesion activity concentrations were higher than in normal tissues & detectable at last imaging timepoint (15d). Conclusions: 177 Lu-rosopatamab + SoC for pts with mCRPC demonstrates a manageable safety & tolerability profile; predictable PK profile with prolonged tumor residence; & organ radiation exposure below recommended thresholds. Radiation absorbed dose was highest for liver (clearance organ), which is comparatively radioresistant. Data support continued investigation in Part 2. Disclosure: This study is sponsored by Telix Pharmaceuticals. Clinical trial information: NCT06520345 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Gary Tincknell
Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
David Michael Gill
Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT
Simon Yuen Fai Fu
Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, BC, New Zealand
Aviral Singh
Alton Oliver Sartor
LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA
David Cade
Telix Pharmaceuticals, Fishers
Neeraj Agarwal
Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA