Safety and dosimetry of <sup>177</sup> Lu-rosopatamab tetraxetanplus SoC in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Preliminary results from part 1 of phase 3 ProstACT Global study.

P Pedro C. Barata (Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA) G Gary Tincknell (Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia) D David Michael Gill (Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT) S Simon Yuen Fai Fu (Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, BC, New Zealand) A Aviral Singh A Alton Oliver Sartor (LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA) D David Cade (Telix Pharmaceuticals, Fishers) N Neeraj Agarwal (Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA)

Abstract

LBA5009 Background: ProstACT Global is a Phase 3 study of 177 Lu-rosopatamab + standard of care (SoC) for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We present preliminary safety, dosimetry, &amp; pharmacokinetics results from Part 1 (Lead-In). Methods: Eligible pts had PSMA+ mCRPC (confirmed on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) with disease progression on ≥12w prior therapy on their 1 st androgen receptor pathway inhibitor in metastatic castration-sensitive PCa, non-mCRPC, or mCRPC setting. Pts may have received docetaxel in mCSPC setting if ≥6 months prior. Pts received 2 single IV injections 177 Lu-rosopatamab (76 mCi each), 14d apart, with assigned SoC (Cohort 1, +abiraterone; Cohort 2, +enzalutamide; Cohort 3, followed by docetaxel; planned n=10 each). Pts were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; onset on or after initiation of study treatment). Pts underwent serial SPECT/CT imaging after 1 77 Lu-rosopatamab administration (4, 24, 96, 168, 360h) for dosimetry &amp; blood sampling for pharmacokinetics (PK). Co-primary endpoints were safety &amp; dosimetry of 177 Lu-rosopatamab + SoC. Analyses were preplanned, descriptive, &amp; overseen by IDMC. No formal statistics were performed. Dosimetry &amp; biodistribution were evaluated using observed values without formal hypothesis testing. Results: Data from 36 pts (baseline median PSA: 18.18 ng/mL) who received any study treatment was included (Cohorts 1, 2, 3: n=11, 11, 14, resp.). 55.6% pts had Gleason score 8-10, 72% pts were 2L mCRPC, &amp; 25% pts had previous taxane exposure. No new safety signals were identified; TEAEs were predominantly transient &amp; manageable hematologic events. Hematologic TEAEs (% pts any grade; Grade ≥3) included thrombocytopenia (77.8%; 44.4%), neutropenia (63.9%; 47.2%), &amp; lymphopenia (55.6%;41.7%). Non-hematologic TEAEs were all Grade ≤2, except for 1 Grade 3 dizziness. Fatigue (19 events) was most common. Only 9 xerostomia events reported (all Grade 1). No Grade 5 treatment-related TEAEs reported. Blood activity concentration over time demonstrated bi-exponential clearance kinetics. Liver received highest absorbed radiation (range, 1.62-5.08 mGy/MBq), with lower doses received by kidneys (0.336-0.961 mGy/MBq) &amp; salivary glands (0.001-0.104 mGy/MBq). Lesion activity concentrations were higher than in normal tissues &amp; detectable at last imaging timepoint (15d). Conclusions: 177 Lu-rosopatamab + SoC for pts with mCRPC demonstrates a manageable safety &amp; tolerability profile; predictable PK profile with prolonged tumor residence; &amp; organ radiation exposure below recommended thresholds. Radiation absorbed dose was highest for liver (clearance organ), which is comparatively radioresistant. Data support continued investigation in Part 2. Disclosure: This study is sponsored by Telix Pharmaceuticals. Clinical trial information: NCT06520345 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 17_suppl
Published June 10, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

P

Pedro C. Barata

Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

G

Gary Tincknell

Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

D

David Michael Gill

Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT

S

Simon Yuen Fai Fu

Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, BC, New Zealand

A

Aviral Singh

A

Alton Oliver Sartor

LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA

D

David Cade

Telix Pharmaceuticals, Fishers

N

Neeraj Agarwal

Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA