Second-line therapy after ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study (GUARDIANS).
Abstract
437 Background: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is a standard first-line therapy for intermediate and poor-risk patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, data guiding the optimal second-line treatment after progression on this regimen remain limited. In this study real-world outcomes following second line treatment in this setting were analyzed. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of second line therapies in 356 real-world patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who experienced disease progression on first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab across 17 tertiary centers in Germany and Switzerland. Results: Median age was 64 years, most patients were male (69.1 %) and had a clear cell histology (74.1 %). ECOG PS was ≥ 2 in 14.3 %. IMDC risk was intermediate in 61.8 % and poor in 28.7 %. Cabozantinib was most frequently administered as subsequent therapy and showed superior median OS and PFS compared to other second-line options. Median OS was 38 months (95 %CI 20.7-55.3) and median PFS 15 months (95 %CI 8.2-21.9) with cabozantinib in second-line setting compared to a median OS of 16 months (95 %CI 10.1-21.9, p = 0.003 ) and median PFS of 7 months (95 %CI 5.1-8.9, p = 0.013 ) in the heterogeneous comparison group including sunitinib (11.3 %), axitinib, pazopanib (both 4.3 %), lenvatinib plus everolimus (3.2 %), tivozanib (2.2 %) and different IO/TKI combinations or study medication (e.g. belzutifan). Comparison of time-to-event data between the two groups revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.515 (95% CI, 0.328–0.807; p = 0.004 ) and for disease progression of 0.608 (95% CI, 0.406–0.912; p = 0.016 ) in favor of cabozantinib. Conclusions: Our real-world data support the use of cabozantinib after disease progression on ipilimumab and nivolumab as first-line therapy of aRCC with robust efficacy. Updated results on response rate, survival data and safety will be available for ASCO GU 2026.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Hendrik Dinkel
University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
Ramona Stelmach
Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Stefanie Zschaebitz
National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Maximilian Haack
Can Aydogdu
Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Jozefina Casuscelli
Timo Egenolf
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
Matteo Silberg
Department of Urology, Marien-Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
Julie Steinestel
Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Arne Strauss
Department of Urology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
Florian Kirchhoff
Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
Marit Ahrens
Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
Richard Cathomas
6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
Berna C. Özdemir
Department of Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
Christopher Gossler
Department of Urology, Krankenhaus St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Philipp Ivanyi
Marc Rehlinghaus
Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Thomas Hilser
Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
Viktor Grünwald
Katrin Schlack
Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center Muenster (WTZ), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany