Second-line therapy after ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study (GUARDIANS).

H Hendrik Dinkel (University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany) R Ramona Stelmach (Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany) S Stefanie Zschaebitz (National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany) M Maximilian Haack C Can Aydogdu (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) J Jozefina Casuscelli T Timo Egenolf (Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany) M Matteo Silberg (Department of Urology, Marien-Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany) J Julie Steinestel (Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany) A Arne Strauss (Department of Urology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany) F Florian Kirchhoff (Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany) M Marit Ahrens (Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany) R Richard Cathomas (6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland) B Berna C. Özdemir (Department of Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland) C Christopher Gossler (Department of Urology, Krankenhaus St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany) P Philipp Ivanyi M Marc Rehlinghaus (Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) T Thomas Hilser (Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany) V Viktor Grünwald K Katrin Schlack (Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center Muenster (WTZ), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany)

Abstract

437 Background: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is a standard first-line therapy for intermediate and poor-risk patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, data guiding the optimal second-line treatment after progression on this regimen remain limited. In this study real-world outcomes following second line treatment in this setting were analyzed. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of second line therapies in 356 real-world patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who experienced disease progression on first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab across 17 tertiary centers in Germany and Switzerland. Results: Median age was 64 years, most patients were male (69.1 %) and had a clear cell histology (74.1 %). ECOG PS was ≥ 2 in 14.3 %. IMDC risk was intermediate in 61.8 % and poor in 28.7 %. Cabozantinib was most frequently administered as subsequent therapy and showed superior median OS and PFS compared to other second-line options. Median OS was 38 months (95 %CI 20.7-55.3) and median PFS 15 months (95 %CI 8.2-21.9) with cabozantinib in second-line setting compared to a median OS of 16 months (95 %CI 10.1-21.9, p = 0.003 ) and median PFS of 7 months (95 %CI 5.1-8.9, p = 0.013 ) in the heterogeneous comparison group including sunitinib (11.3 %), axitinib, pazopanib (both 4.3 %), lenvatinib plus everolimus (3.2 %), tivozanib (2.2 %) and different IO/TKI combinations or study medication (e.g. belzutifan). Comparison of time-to-event data between the two groups revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.515 (95% CI, 0.328–0.807; p = 0.004 ) and for disease progression of 0.608 (95% CI, 0.406–0.912; p = 0.016 ) in favor of cabozantinib. Conclusions: Our real-world data support the use of cabozantinib after disease progression on ipilimumab and nivolumab as first-line therapy of aRCC with robust efficacy. Updated results on response rate, survival data and safety will be available for ASCO GU 2026.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 437-437
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

H

Hendrik Dinkel

University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

R

Ramona Stelmach

Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

S

Stefanie Zschaebitz

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

M

Maximilian Haack

C

Can Aydogdu

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

J

Jozefina Casuscelli

T

Timo Egenolf

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany

M

Matteo Silberg

Department of Urology, Marien-Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany

J

Julie Steinestel

Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

A

Arne Strauss

Department of Urology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

F

Florian Kirchhoff

Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

M

Marit Ahrens

Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

R

Richard Cathomas

6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland

B

Berna C. Özdemir

Department of Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland

C

Christopher Gossler

Department of Urology, Krankenhaus St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

P

Philipp Ivanyi

M

Marc Rehlinghaus

Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

T

Thomas Hilser

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany

V

Viktor Grünwald

K

Katrin Schlack

Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center Muenster (WTZ), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany