Severity of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity in Indian patients with intermediate and poor-risk non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): A clinical perspective.
Abstract
635 Background: Bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy is the standard of care in advanced NSGCT due to its extremely high efficacy. The incidence of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity ranges between 5-40%. Risk factors include older patients, smokers, pre-existing lung diseases, cumulative dose > 300 units and previous radiation to thorax. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset of intermediate and poor risk NSGCT patients treated with BEP at a comprehensive cancer care centre in India. Adolescent and adult males with an eastern co-operative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2 who developed bleomycin-induced lung toxicity were included. Descriptive analyses were performed and Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation of survival using SPSS version 29.0. Results: A total of 223 patients with intermediate and poor risk NSGCT received BEP, of which 30 (13%) developed bleomycin induced lung toxicity and were included in this analysis. The median age was 31.5 years (IQR: 25.75 - 34.5 years) (Table). Twenty-eight (93.3%) were non-smokers while 14 (46.7%) did not have lung metastases. Six (20%) had baseline serum creatinine > 1.3mg/dL. Twelve (40%) required granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The median baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) was 3.88 L while diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 90%. Post BEP, the median FVC was 2.76 L while DLCO was 68% among those who had lung toxicity. Seventeen (56.7%) were symptomatic for lung toxicity while 13 (43.3%) had grade 1 pneumonitis. Eighteen (60%) received 4 cycles of BEP, 8 (26.7%) received 3 cycles while 4 (13.3%) received 2 cycles prior to developing lung toxicity. Seven (23.3%) required hospitalization of which 6 (20%) had hospital stay for more than 10 days, 5 (16.7%) required ambulatory oxygen and 4 (13.3%) required intensive care. Nineteen (63.3%) required steroids. Five (16.7%) died due to bleomycin-induced lung toxicity. With a median follow-up of 81 months, the 5-year and 10-year OS were 61.6% and 55.5% respectively. Conclusions: The potential of bleomycin to cause lung toxicity necessitates careful patient selection, monitoring and optimal management. Patient characteristics. Characteristics All patients(n = 30) Age group Less than 35 years 23 (76.7%) More than or equal to 35 years 7 (23.3%) Primary site Testis 28 (93.4%) Retro-peritoneum 1 (3.3%) Mediastinum 1 (3.3%) Risk stratification Intermediate 15 (50%) Poor 15 (50%) Lung metastases None 14 (46.7%) Unilateral 3 (10%) Bilateral 13 (43.3%) Grade of pneumonitis (CTCAE v5.0) Grade I 13 (43.3%) Grade II 10 (33.3%) Grade III 2 (6.7%) Grade IV 0 Grade V 5 (16.7%) CT chest findings Air-space consolidation 1 (3.3%) Ground glass or nodular opacities 10 (33.3%) Reticular interstitial thickening 14 (46.7%) Fibrotic changes 5 (16.7%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Himanshu Gujarathi
TMH, Mumbai, India
Aditya Dhanawat
ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Bhagyashri Jadhav
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Atul Tiwari
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Kunal Naishadh Jobanputra
MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India
Kriti YC
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC) and Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Mumbai, India
Pallavi Rane
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC) and Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Mumbai, India
Minit Jalan Shah
Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Nandini Sharrel Menon
Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Priyamvada Maitre
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Mahendra Pal
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Amandeep Arora
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Aparna Ringe-Katdare
Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
Santosh Menon
Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Gagan Prakash
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Vedang Murthy
Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Center for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India
Vanita Noronha
Kumar Prabhash, MD, DM, MBBS, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India, Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur, India; Vanita Noronha, MD, DM, MBBS, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Akash Pawar, MSc, Department of Statistics, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India, Ankush Shetake, MSc, Department of Statistics, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur, India; and Rajendra Badwe, MS, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Kumar Prabhash
Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Adult Solid Tumor Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
Saneep Tandon
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC) and Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Mumbai, India
Amit Joshi
Sr. Specialist, Department of Forensic Medicine, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India