Site-specific disease progression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or axitinib-based immunotargeted combinations.

I Ilya Tsimafeyeu (Bureau for Cancer Research - BUCARE, Moscow office, Moscow, Russian Federation) F Fuad Guliyev (National Center of Oncology, Baku, Azerbaijan) G Gunel Musayeva (National Center of Oncology, Baku, Azerbaijan) R Ramil Abdrakhmanov (Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan) V Viacheslav Chubenko (Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Saint-Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological)", Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation) O Olga Baklanova (Irkutsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Irkutsk, Russian Federation) R Ruslan Zukov (20Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation) V Vladislav Petkau (Sverdlovskiy Regional Oncological Dispensary, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation) I Igor Myslevtsev (S.P. Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation) A Alisher Kahharov (Tashkent State Dental Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan) B Bakytzhan Ongarbayev (Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan) D Dilyara Kaidarova

Abstract

478 Background: Data on site-specific progression patterns in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immuno-oncology agents are limited. This study aimed to characterize sites of progression in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) or axitinib-based immunotargeted combinations in the first-line setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study included patients with clear-cell mRCC who received either Nivo-Ipi (Cohort A) or pembrolizumab-axitinib and avelumab-axitinib (Cohort B) from 2018 to 2024. The primary objective was to assess the occurrence of new lesions in different organs. Secondary analysis evaluated disease progression by an increase of more than 20% in target lesion size. Results: A total of 334 patients were identified, with radiographic progression observed in 86.3% (107/124) of Cohort A and 60% (126/210) of Cohort B. In the ITT population (n=233), the median age at mRCC diagnosis was 59.7 years (range 31–84), 79% were male, 74% had undergone nephrectomy, 61% had intermediate IMDC risk, and 64% had two or more metastatic sites. Cohort B had a younger median age (60.2 vs. 65.4 years), a higher incidence of bone metastases (28.6% vs. 13.1%), and more favorable risk (15.1% vs. 0.9%) compared to Cohort A. The site-specific rate of new lesions differed between cohorts (Table). Progression due to increased target lesions occurred in 60.7% (65/107) of Cohort A and 77.8% (98/126) of Cohort B patients. Conclusions: New lesion development was more frequent with Nivo-Ipi, with lymph nodes being the most common site of new lesions of mRCC across both cohorts. Cohort An=107 Cohort Bn=126 Baseline At the time of progression Baseline At the time of progression Patients with new lesions, n (%) - 42 (39.3) - 28 (22.2) Sites of metastases, n (%) Lung 73 (68) 81 (76) 76 (60) 79 (63) Lymph node 55 (51) 94 (88) 68 (54) 81 (64) Liver 27 (25) 28 (26) 39 (31) 47 (37) Bone 14 (13) 26 (24) 36 (29) 41 (33) Adrenal gland 19 (18) 20 (19) 20 (16) 28 (22) Contralateral kidney 5 (5) 5 (5) 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6) Brain 1 (1) 2 (2) 4 (3) 4 (3) Soft tissues 4 (4) 4 (4) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) Pancreas 2 (2) 3 (3) 0 (0) 2 (1.6) Other* 5 (5) 7 (7) 9 (7) 9 (7) *Thyroid gland, pleura, peritoneum, ovary, breast.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 478-478
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

I

Ilya Tsimafeyeu

Bureau for Cancer Research - BUCARE, Moscow office, Moscow, Russian Federation

F

Fuad Guliyev

National Center of Oncology, Baku, Azerbaijan

G

Gunel Musayeva

National Center of Oncology, Baku, Azerbaijan

R

Ramil Abdrakhmanov

Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan

V

Viacheslav Chubenko

Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Saint-Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological)", Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

O

Olga Baklanova

Irkutsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Irkutsk, Russian Federation

R

Ruslan Zukov

20Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

V

Vladislav Petkau

Sverdlovskiy Regional Oncological Dispensary, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

I

Igor Myslevtsev

S.P. Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation

A

Alisher Kahharov

Tashkent State Dental Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

B

Bakytzhan Ongarbayev

Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan

D

Dilyara Kaidarova