SKYSCRAPER-01: Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab in Previously Untreated PD-L1–High, Locally Advanced, Unresectable or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

S Solange Peters R Roy Herbst (Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT) H Hidehito Horinouchi (National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan) L Luis Paz-Ares (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid) M Melissa Johnson (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville) B Benjamin J. Solomon (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) M Mahmut Gümüş (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey) M Mustafa Erman I Igor Bondarenko (Dniprovsky State Medical University, Dnipro, Ukraine) D Dong-Wan Kim (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea) E Enriqueta Felip (Medical Oncology Service, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona) A Alessandro Morabito M Maciej Bryl L Laszlo Urban (Matrahaza University and Teaching Hospital, Heves, Hungary) K Kaname Nosaki (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) M Martin Reck R Raymond Meng (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) C Chipman Stroud (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) P Palak Kundu (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) X Xiaohui Wen N Namrata S. Patil (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) M Meilin Huang (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) S Sarah Troutman (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) C Christina Matheny (Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) B Byoung Chul Cho

Abstract

PURPOSE Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab has shown encouraging survival outcomes in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily in patients with PD-L1–high tumors. We further evaluated the combination of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab in the phase III SKYSCRAPER-01 study. METHODS Patients with untreated, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic PD-L1–high (by central laboratory testing) NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either tiragolumab (600 mg) plus atezolizumab (1,200 mg) or placebo plus atezolizumab (1,200 mg) intravenously in 21-day cycles until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the primary analysis set (PD-L1–high per 22C3 assay). RESULTS Five hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to either the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab group (n = 262) or the placebo plus atezolizumab group (n = 259). At the primary PFS analysis (Mar 12, 2022; median follow-up 9.9 months [IQR, 6.2-13.8]), median INV-PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.8) with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 7.0) with placebo plus atezolizumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97]; P = .02 [nonsignificant]). At the final OS analysis (Sept 24, 2024; median follow-up 17.9 months [IQR, 6.7-39.0]), median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 28.8) with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and 16.9 months (95% CI, 14.6 to 21.3) with placebo plus atezolizumab (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.7 to 1.1]; P = .22 [nonsignificant]). Overall, 41.2% (n = 110/267) and 33.8% (n = 89/263) of patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and placebo plus atezolizumab, respectively. Four and two treatment-related deaths occurred in each group, respectively. CONCLUSION Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab did not demonstrate a statistically significant INV-PFS or OS benefit over atezolizumab in patients with previously untreated PD-L1–high NSCLC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published July 27, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (25)

S

Solange Peters

R

Roy Herbst

Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT

H

Hidehito Horinouchi

National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

L

Luis Paz-Ares

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid

M

Melissa Johnson

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville

B

Benjamin J. Solomon

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

M

Mahmut Gümüş

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

M

Mustafa Erman

I

Igor Bondarenko

Dniprovsky State Medical University, Dnipro, Ukraine

D

Dong-Wan Kim

School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

E

Enriqueta Felip

Medical Oncology Service, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona

A

Alessandro Morabito

M

Maciej Bryl

L

Laszlo Urban

Matrahaza University and Teaching Hospital, Heves, Hungary

K

Kaname Nosaki

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

M

Martin Reck

R

Raymond Meng

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

C

Chipman Stroud

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

P

Palak Kundu

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

X

Xiaohui Wen

N

Namrata S. Patil

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

M

Meilin Huang

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

S

Sarah Troutman

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

C

Christina Matheny

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

B

Byoung Chul Cho