Subgroup analyses by disease volume and <i>de novo</i> /recurrent mHSPC in the PSMAddition study of [ <sup>177</sup> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.

F Fred Saad (Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal) S Scott T. Tagawa (Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY) A Alton Oliver Sartor (LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA) K Karim Olivier Fizazi (Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France) A Alison Helen Reid (The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom) H Himisha Beltran J Josep M. Piulats G Gero Kramer H Hakim Mahammedi (Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France) M Matthias Eiber S Shilpa Gupta (Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA) O Olga V. Sakharova (Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland) E Emmanuel Bouillaud (Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland) M Michael J. Morris (Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

Abstract

5020 Background: In the phase 3 PSMAddition study (NCT04720157), combining [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) with ADT + ARPI significantly improved rPFS in patients with PSMA+ mHSPC vs ADT + ARPI at rPFS interim analysis (data cut off Jan 13, 2025), with a HR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.58, 0.90; p = 0.002). Methods: Patients had treatment-naive/minimally treated mHSPC diagnosed by CT/MRI/bone scan and ≥1 PSMA+ metastatic lesion on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq ± 10% q6w, 6 cycles) + ADT + ARPI ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm) or ADT + ARPI (control arm). The primary endpoint of rPFS (centrally assessed rPD per PCWG3/RECIST v1.1 or death) and selected secondary efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed in subgroups of high/low disease volume (DV) per CHAARTED criteria (locally assessed by CT/MRI/bone scan; prespecified) and de novo /recurrent mHSPC (AJCC stage ≥/&lt;IVb; post hoc ) . Results: Of 572 patients randomized to the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm and 572 to the control arm, 68.0% and 68.2% had high DV, and 52.1% and 47.9% had de novo mHSPC. Efficacy and PRO HRs for the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm vs control arm were generally similar in the overall population and DV and mHSPC subgroups (rPFS HR 0.72–0.74; time to PSA progression HR 0.29–0.51) (Table). Incidences of AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs, and selected safety topics of interest (cytopenias, dry mouth) were similar across subgroups within each treatment arm. Conclusions: In patients with PSMA+ mHSPC, combining 177 Lu-PSMA-617 with ADT + ARPI improved rPFS vs ADT + ARPI across high/low DV and de novo /recurrent mHSPC subgroups. Other efficacy outcomes, PROs, and the safety profile were generally consistent across subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT04720157 . Efficacy and PROs. HR (95% CI) for 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm vs control arm OverallN = 1144 High DVn = 779 Low DVn = 365 De novo mHSPCn = 572 Recurrent mHSPCn = 523 rPFS a 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) 0.72 (0.56, 0.92) 0.73 (0.42, 1.27) 0.74 (0.54, 1.01) 0.74 (0.53, 1.04) PFS per investigator b 0.64 (0.51, 0.79) 0.61 (0.48, 0.78) 0.80 (0.46, 1.37) 0.65 (0.48, 0.88) 0.64 (0.46, 0.89) Time to: PSA progression 0.42 (0.30, 0.59) 0.43 (0.31, 0.62) 0.29 (0.08, 1.05) 0.51 (0.32, 0.79) 0.35 (0.21, 0.60) Symptomatic skeletal event 0.89 (0.62, 1.26) 0.93 (0.64, 1.37) 0.67 (0.27, 1.66) 0.97 (0.60, 1.57) 0.82 (0.48, 1.40) mCRPC 0.70 (0.58, 0.84) 0.67 (0.54, 0.82) 0.87 (0.55, 1.37) 0.61 (0.47, 0.80) 0.75 (0.56, 1.00) BPI-SF pain intensity worsening c 1.02 (0.87, 1.18) 0.98 (0.82, 1.18) 1.09 (0.83, 1.44) 1.06 (0.85, 1.31) 0.97 (0.78, 1.22) FACT-P total score worsening c 1.14 (0.98, 1.33) 1.13 (0.94, 1.37) 1.16 (0.88, 1.53) 1.13 (0.90, 1.41) 1.16 (0.92, 1.46) EQ-5D-5L worsening c 1.13 (0.97, 1.31) 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) 1.34 (1.01, 1.77) 1.17 (0.93, 1.45) 1.09 (0.87, 1.37) N may differ across outcomes. a rPD by BIRC or death. b Composite of radiographic, clinical, and PSA progression and death. c Composite with clinical progression and death.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5020-5020
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

F

Fred Saad

Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal

S

Scott T. Tagawa

Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

A

Alton Oliver Sartor

LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA

K

Karim Olivier Fizazi

Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France

A

Alison Helen Reid

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

H

Himisha Beltran

J

Josep M. Piulats

G

Gero Kramer

H

Hakim Mahammedi

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France

M

Matthias Eiber

S

Shilpa Gupta

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

O

Olga V. Sakharova

Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland

E

Emmanuel Bouillaud

Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland

M

Michael J. Morris

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center