Survival outcomes with lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient according to baseline tumor characteristics.
Abstract
35 Background: To investigate cancer-control outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving Lutetium-177 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-617 (Lu-177-PSMA) radioligand therapy according to initial baseline tumor characteristics. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP (FRAnkfurt Metastatic Cancer database of the Prostate) database to assess progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) in patients receiving Lu-177-PSMA as first to seventh mCRPC line, according to initial time of metastasis (synchronous vs. metachronous), tumor grading (Gleason score [GS] 6-7 vs. 8-10) and M-stage (M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c) at initial metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Kaplan-Meier curve analyses and multivariable Cox regression were applied. Results: Of 344 Lu-177-PSMA mCRPC patients, 198 (58%) had synchronous vs. 146 (42%) metachronous mHSPC, 87 (29%) vs. 107 (62%) GS 6-7 vs. 8-10 and 15 (10%) vs. 121 (81%) vs. 13 (9%) M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mHSPC disease. Regarding cancer-control outcomes, no significant differences were observed in PFS (12.1 vs. 13.0 months) and OS (14.9 vs. 18.3 months) between synchronous and metachronous patients (both p≥0.1). Further, no differences were found in PFS (12.9 vs. 11.8 months) and OS (21.4 vs. 15.1 months) between GS 6-7 vs. GS 8-10 (both p≥0.3). Finally, in M-stage stratified analyses, M1a and M1b patients harbored more favorable survival outcomes compared to M1c in OS (17.9 vs. 17.7 vs. 9.0 months, p=0.01), but not for PFS (11.9 vs. 9.5 vs. 8.2 months, p=0.08). In multivariable Cox regression models adjusted additionally for ECOG status, neither initial time of metastasis, GS 8-10 nor M-stage were independently associated with worse PFS and OS outcomes. Conclusions: Lu-177-PSMA presents a viable therapeutic option providing favourable cancer-control outcomes in mCRPC patients across all subgroups of initially mHSPC patients, such as timing of metastatic disease, different tumor gradings and M-stage categories.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Quynh Chi Le
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Mike Wenzel
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Carolin Siech
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
Benedikt Hoeh
Konrad Klimek
Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
Christian Happel
Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
Fred Saad
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal
Felix Preisser
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Derya Tilki
Markus Graefen
Thomas Steuber
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Tobias Maurer
Maximilian Kriegmair
Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
Pierre Karakiewicz
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
Felix K.H. Chun
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Daniel Groener
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Philipp Mandel
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany