SWOG 2427: Single arm phase II study of bladder preservation with immunoradiotherapy after a clinically meaningful response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (BRIGHT).

L Leslie K. Ballas (Department of Radiation Oncology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA) S Samuel Callis (SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) S Siamak Daneshmand (Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center) A Abhishek Tripathi (Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA) D Daniel Allan Hamstra (Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J James B. Yu (Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH) M Mark Tyson (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) K Kent William Mouw (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) J Joshua J. Meeks (Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL) D David James McConkey (University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY) K Kyle M. Rose (Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA) K Karine Tawagi (2University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, United States) K Kriti Mittal (UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA) S Sean Sachdev (Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL) T Thomas W. Flaig (University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora) S Seth P. Lerner (Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston)

Abstract

TPS913 Background: A subset of patients with MIBC who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) have a pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of RC. With pCR rates of 22-42% in patients with MIBC following NAT (+/- ICI), whether a subset of patients with good clinical response to NAT can avoid RC is an important unanswered question, especially with the development of more active systemic therapies. HCRN 16-257 evaluated maintenance nivolumab in lieu of cystectomy in patients with MIBC who experienced clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant GC and nivolumab. The cCR rate was 48%, but 8/33 (24%) patients who elected bladder preservation subsequently underwent cystectomy for local disease recurrence. The RETAIN trial also evaluated omission of local therapy following neoadjuvant therapy with a 2-year bladder preservation rate in patients with ≤T1 disease following NAC of 54% (22/41). Of the 9/25 (36%) patients on that trial developed metastatic disease, 8/9 developed localized disease before metastasizing. These data illustrate the critical role that local therapy plays in patients with MIBC. For this reason, we believe that radiotherapy to the bladder combined with ICI will improve bladder intact event-free survival (BI-EFS). This trial also allows for patients to opt for bladder preservation based on a good clinical response to NAT. Methods: This is a single arm, phase 2 trial (NCT07061964) evaluating risk-adapted bladder preservation therapy for patients with MIBC following NAT. NAT consists of any NCCN guideline concordant therapy for MIBC. Patients with cT2-T4aN0M0 MIBC who complete NAT will be eligible if they have ≤T1 disease on post-NAT TURBT, confirmed by biopsies of prior tumor sites and systematic sampling (left/right lateral walls, dome, posterior wall, trigone). Patients will receive 55 Gray (Gy) in 20 fractions of radiotherapy (RT) to the bladder with 1 year of pembrolizumab. The primary objective is to evaluate whether 3-year BI-EFS is at least 70% in participants with < = T1 (without multifocal CIS) following NAT and RT with 1 year of pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives include local muscle invasive recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), the rate of salvage cystectomy, and evaluation of the frequency and severity of toxicities in participants who receive RT and pembrolizumab. Plasma and urine will be banked for future correlative studies. S2427 was activated in September 2025 with an accrual goal of 111 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT07061964 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

L

Leslie K. Ballas

Department of Radiation Oncology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA

S

Samuel Callis

SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

S

Siamak Daneshmand

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

A

Abhishek Tripathi

Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA

D

Daniel Allan Hamstra

Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

James B. Yu

Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

M

Mark Tyson

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

K

Kent William Mouw

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

J

Joshua J. Meeks

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

D

David James McConkey

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

K

Kyle M. Rose

Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA

K

Karine Tawagi

2University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, United States

K

Kriti Mittal

UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA

S

Sean Sachdev

Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL

T

Thomas W. Flaig

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

S

Seth P. Lerner

Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston