The effect of obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) on adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) and extramedullary disease (EMD).
Abstract
6517 Background: Pts with R/R B-ALL and EMD have limited treatment options and are a population with an unmet need. Obe-cel is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with a fast off-rate CAT19 binding domain and a 4-1BB-ζ co-stimulatory domain designed to improve persistence and reduce severe immunotoxicity. Here, we report a post-hoc analysis of the Phase Ib/II FELIX study (NCT04404660), evaluating efficacy and safety of obe-cel in pts with R/R B-ALL, by EMD status at lymphodepletion (LD). Methods: Following LD, adults with R/R B-ALL received obe-cel using a tumor burden-guided dosing strategy to minimize toxicity. Overall remission rate (ORR; complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety are reported for pts with or without (w/o) EMD. Results: Of 127 obe-cel infused pts, 27 (21%) had EMD at LD and 100 (79%) did not. At screening, the median age (range) was 36.0 years (20–73) in pts with EMD, and 50.5 years (20–81) in pts w/o EMD. Of the pts with EMD, 13 (48%) were male and 11 (41%) were Hispanic or Latino; of those w/o EMD, 53 (53%) were male and 27 (27%) were Hispanic or Latino. The median number of prior lines of therapy (range) was 3.0 (1–6) and 2.0 (1–6) for pts with and w/o EMD at LD, respectively; prior SCT was received by 12 (44%) and 44 (44%) pts, respectively. At LD, the median bone marrow (BM) blast percentage (range) was 54% (0–100) in pts with EMD and 39% (0–100) in pts w/o EMD; Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease was observed in 6 (22%) and 30 (30%) pts, respectively. At 32.8 months’ (mos) median follow-up (range 20–53), the ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 59% (39–78) in pts with EMD and 83% (74–90) in pts w/o EMD. Median DoR (95% CI) among responders was 42.5 mos (3.4–not evaluable [NE]) and NE, in those with (n=16) and w/o (n=83) EMD at LD, respectively. Overall, median EFS (95% CI) was 4.5 mos (0.0–NE) and 14.3 mos (9.0–NE) in pts with and w/o EMD at LD, respectively; however, median EFS appeared to be comparable in responders with (44.6 mos [6.0–NE]) and w/o EMD (NE). Overall, median OS (95% CI) was 15.3 mos (7.9–NE) and 21.0 mos (13.2–NE) in pts with and w/o EMD at LD, respectively. The incidence of Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome in pts with and those w/o EMD was 3.7% and 2.0%; the incidence of Grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 19% and 4.0%, respectively. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic analyses are underway; data will be presented. Conclusions: Obe-cel treatment demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety outcomes in pts with and w/o EMD in the FELIX trial. Among responders, DoR in pts with EMD was comparable with that observed in pts w/o EMD. Overall, these findings support a positive benefit–risk profile for obe-cel, irrespective of EMD status at LD. Clinical trial information: NCT04404660 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Jae Hong Park
Karamjeet S. Sandhu
City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
Claire Roddie
1University College London Cancer Institute, Research Department of Haematology, London, United Kingdom
Bijal D. Shah
34Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
Eleni Tholouli
4Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
Paul Shaughnessy
30Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program at Methodist Hospital, San Antonio, United States
Pere Barba
Hematology Department. Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
Manuel Guerreiro
9Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain
Deborah Yallop
King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London
Aaron C. Logan
19Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Mehrdad Abedi
5Division of Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
Michael Russell Bishop
The David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Daniel J. DeAngelo
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Pierre Lao-Sirieix
Autolus Therapeutics, London
Ping Wang
Wolfram Brugger
Autolus Therapeutics, London
Elias Jabbour
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA