The Rise of Aqueous Selenium‐Based Batteries: Challenges, Strategies, and the Path Forward

Z Zhichao Wang (New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety & CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience) C Chaoyi Qiu (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shaoxing University Shaoxing Zhejiang P. R. China) Z Zhiwei Chen Z Zening Wu H Haoxiang Yu L Lei Yan (Department of Materials Science and Engineering) L Liyuan Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Advanced Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials) T Ting‐Feng Yi (Key Laboratory of Dielectric and Electrolyte Functional Material Hebei Province, School of Resources and Materials Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao Qinhuangdao Hebei P. R. China) J Jie Shu

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aqueous metal‐selenium batteries (AMSeBs) have emerged as promising candidates for safe, cost‐effective, and high‐energy‐density energy storage, yet their development is hindered by challenges spanning electrode stability, reaction reversibility, and electrolyte compatibility. This review systematically explores the thermodynamic and electrochemical landscape of AMSeBs, integrating theoretical analysis with experimental advances to establish a rational design framework. First, by evaluating key parameters, including electrode potentials, volume change rates, solubility of metal selenides, and energy metrics, we identify promising systems such as Zn‐Se and Cu‐Se, along with unexplored candidates like Fe‐Se and Ga‐Se. Second, selenium‐based cathodes are categorized into three types, elemental Se & Se x S y composites, organic selenides, and transition metal selenides, with emphasis on multi‐electron transfer mechanisms, particularly the six‐electron Se 4+ /Se 2− redox pathway, which offers a route to overcome capacity limitations. Third, strategies for stabilizing metal anodes, expanding the electrochemical stability window of aqueous electrolytes, and mitigating shuttle effects are critically discussed. Finally, we outline future directions, including interface engineering, artificial intelligence‐assisted material screening, and flexible device integration, providing a roadmap toward high‐performance AMSeBs for next‐generation energy storage applications.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 15
Published March 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (9)

Z

Zhichao Wang

New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety & CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience

C

Chaoyi Qiu

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shaoxing University Shaoxing Zhejiang P. R. China

Z

Zhiwei Chen

Z

Zening Wu

H

Haoxiang Yu

L

Lei Yan

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

L

Liyuan Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Advanced Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials

T

Ting‐Feng Yi

Key Laboratory of Dielectric and Electrolyte Functional Material Hebei Province, School of Resources and Materials Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao Qinhuangdao Hebei P. R. China

J

Jie Shu