Tislelizumab plus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT or chemotherapy (CT) as the neoadjuvant treatment for patients (pts) with locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC): A multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, phase IIb study (TERRIFIC).

J Jia Wei (State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Nanjing Normal University) H Hongfeng Gou (Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China) J Ju Yang X Xiaofeng Lu N Ninggang Zhang (Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China) Q Qi Sun H Hua Wang M Meng Wang F Feng Wang L Liang Tao S Song Liu K Kun Yang J Jiankun Hu W Wenxian Guan B Baorui Liu

Abstract

286 Background: MATTERHORN study has demonstrated that immunotherapy (IO) plus triple CT as neoadjuvant treatment significantly improves pCR and prolongs EFS in GC/GEJC. In the previous single-arm SHARED study, we found that IO plus CRT showed promising efficacy and manageable safety as perioperative treatment for GC/GEJC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab (TIS) plus CRT, as compared to CRT or CT alone, in the neoadjuvant treatment of pts with GC/GEJC. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed locally advanced GC/GEJC, stage III-IVa and no prior anticancer therapy were enrolled and randomized (2:2:1) to receive TIS (200 mg) plus CRT (45Gy, SOX or S1+nab-PTX) (arm A), CRT (arm B), or CT alone (SOX or S1+nab-PTX) (arm C) for 3 cycles as neoadjuvant treatment. After surgery, all pts would receive 3 cycles of CT followed by 3 cycles of S-1 as maintenance therapy, with arm A continuing TIS maintenance therapy for 12 months. The primary endpoint was pCR rate assessed in intent to treatment (ITT) set. Secondary endpoints included pCR rate assessed in pts underwent surgery, major pathological response (MPR) assessed in ITT and pts underwent surgery, 2-year EFS/OS rate and safety. Results: Herein, we reported the preliminary results. 87 pts were randomized (arm A, 35; arm B, 33; arm C, 19) with 58.6% T4a/b and 85.1% N2-3. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. 60 pts underwent surgery (arm A, 23; arm B, 24; arm C, 13). Efficacy was assessed in pts underwent surgery. The pCR rate was better in arm A versus arm C (34.8% vs. 0%) and arm A versus arm B (34.8% vs. 25%). The MPR rate was higher in arm A versus C (65.2% vs. 15.4%) and was similar between arm A and arm B (65.2% vs. 62.5%). Grade ≥3 TRAE occurred in 14.3% of arm A, 9.1% of arm B and 10.5% of arm C. Any grade irAE was reported in 9 (25.0%) pts of arm A. Conclusions: The preliminary results showed that TIS plus CRT had higher pCR rate over CRT or CT alone for pts with locally advanced GC/GEJC, further confirm the improved efficacy of IO as neoadjuvant therapy for GC/GEJC. Clinical trial information: NCT05687357 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 286-286
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

J

Jia Wei

State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Nanjing Normal University

H

Hongfeng Gou

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

J

Ju Yang

X

Xiaofeng Lu

N

Ninggang Zhang

Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China

Q

Qi Sun

H

Hua Wang

M

Meng Wang

F

Feng Wang

L

Liang Tao

S

Song Liu

K

Kun Yang

J

Jiankun Hu

W

Wenxian Guan

B

Baorui Liu