Total respiratory tract immunization induces optimal systemic and regional antigen-specific immune responses 2244163
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Respiratory infections represent a major global health challenge. Different intranasal vaccine strategies can target specific areas of the respiratory tract, which may influence local and systemic immune responses. Methods Here, we combined peptide-major histocompatibility complex class I and II (pMHCI and pMHCII) tetramers with flow cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to comprehensively study spike-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells following immunization with SARS-CoV2 spike protein. Following intramuscular (IM) priming with spike protein and poly:IC, we compared different boosting strategies - upper respiratory tract (URT), total respiratory tract (TRT), and IM. Results At 4 weeks post-boost, the number of spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was higher in the lungs of mice receiving TRT boosting compared to URT or IM boosting. We also observed higher frequencies and numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ resident memory T cells (TRM) in the lungs of TRT versus URT or IM groups. In the nasal mucosa (NM), both TRT and URT boosting resulted in higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ TRM cells than IM. Notably, TRT was the only boost strategy that induced serum and lung spike-specific IgA. However, despite generating fewer spike-specific T cells and antibodies than TRT, URT boosting still protected mice against viral challenge. Moreover, both spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells obtained from the NM expressed higher levels of IFN-g, and spike-specific CD8+ T cells in the NM produced higher levels of granzyme B compared to those cells recovered from lung and spleen. Finally, scRNAseq analysis with barcoded tetramers revealed that epitope specificity influenced CD4+ T cell differentiation resulting in epitope-specific T helper cell bias. Conclusion In sum, TRT boosting enhanced lung immunity and epitope-driven CD4+ T cell phenotypes offer a promising approach to guide optimized vaccine design. Funding Source NIH P01 AI165072 AND AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION CA-1252074 Topic Categories Mucosal and Regional Immunology (MUC)
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Immunology
American Association of Immunologists
Authors (19)
Juliana Barreto de Albuquerque
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Neal Smith
Massachusetts General Hospital/ Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard
YeePui Yeung
Massachusetts General Hospital
Isabela Kernin
Massachusetts General Hospital/ Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard
Nadini Samanta
Massachusetts General Hospital/ Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard
Qixin Wang
Keerti Fnu
Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School
Caihong Bi
Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School
Eduardo Olmedillas
Tianyi Bai
Massachusetts General Hospital
Thao Nguyen
Rachel Olson
Laboratory for Infectious Disease Research, University of Missouri Division of Research
Erica Saphire
The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla
Duane Wesemann
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Anthony Griffiths
Laboratory for Infectious Disease Research, University of Missouri Division of Research
Ryan McNamara
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Alexandra-Chloé Villani
James Moon
Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom
Andrew Luster
Massachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical School/ Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard