TP53 Y220C mutations in advanced urothelial bladder cancer (UBC): A genomic landscape study.

R Rosa Nadal (University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) J Joseph M Jacob (Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY) G Gennady Bratslavsky (SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY) A Alina Basnet (Renzi Cancer Center, The Guthrie Clinic, Cortland, NY) J Jeffrey S. Ross (4Foundation Medicine, Cambrige, United States) D Douglas I Lin (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA) O Ole Gjoerup (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA) L Liang Cheng (Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices) S Shilpa Gupta (Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA) N Neeraj Agarwal (Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA) P Philippe E. Spiess R Roger Li (Department of Genitourinary Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA) A Ashish M. Kamat A Andrea Necchi (Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy) P Petros Grivas (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA)

Abstract

821 Background: TP53 is the most frequently altered gene in human cancers. Novel agents targeting the pathogenic TP53- Y220C mutation and p53-based cancer therapy have attracted significant interest. Evaluation of TP53- Y220C mutation and co-occurrent alterations in UBC is needed. Methods: FFPE tissue from 11,224 UBC patients (pts) underwent hybridization capture and comprehensive genomic profiling. A total of 324 cancer related genes including selected introns of 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer were evaluated for genomic alterations (GA). We obtained an average sequencing depth of 650X. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were estimated using next-generation sequencing. TMB-high was defined as ≥10 mutations/Mb. PD-L1 expression was measured by IHC (DAKO 22C3). Comparisons were performed using the χ 2 method with Yates correction. Results: TP53 Y220C mutation (Y220C+) was identified in 73 UBC (0.65%). Age/gender were comparable between TP53 Y220C negative (Y220C-) and TP53 Y220C+ pts; 8.4% of TP53 Y220C+ and 8.2% of TP53 Y220C- UBC cases exhibited ≥1 GA. In TP53 Y220C+ UBC, the frequency of co-occurring GA was significantly lower for FGFR3 (8.2% vs 18.3%; P = .038), MTAP loss (13.3% vs 25.1%; P = .035), CDKN2A (26% vs 37.8%; P = .05), and CDKN2B (19.2% vs 30.2%; P = .05) vs TP53 Y220C- UBC. BRCA1 GA was significantly higher in TP53 Y220C+ UBC (8.2% vs 2.0%; P < .0001). In TP53 Y220C+ UBC, trends were observed with numerically higher GA frequency in ERBB2 (20.5% vs 17.6%; not significant [NS]), RB1 (24.7% vs. 21.4%; NS) and numerically lower GA frequencies in TERT (61.1% vs 76.1%; NS), PIK3CA (15.1% vs 21.6%; NS). No significant differences in other GA frequencies: TSC1 (8.2% vs 9.0%, NS), ERBB3 (6.8% to 6.2%, NS), BRCA2 (4.1% to 3.2%, NS), FGFR2 (2.7% to 1.1%, NS), or in MSI / TMB status were detected between groups. PD-L1 low expression (1-49%) was observed in 7.3% of TP53 Y220C+ UBC. Conclusions: The TP53 Y220C mutation is rare in advanced UBC (< 1% of cases). In our study, this mutation was associated with specific co-occurring GA, notably with a significantly lower frequency of FGFR3 and higher BRCA1 GA. TP53 Y220C mutation warrants further clinical investigation in basket trials, including UBC, e.g. NCT04585750. TP53 Y220C+ UBCn=73 TP53 Y220C- UBCn=11,151 p value BRCA1 8.2% 2% <.0001 FGFR3 8.2% 18.3% .038 MTAP 13.3% 25.1% .035 CDKN2A 26% 37.8% .05 CDKN2B 19.2% 30.2% .05 MSI-high 0% 0.7% NS TMB-high 34.2% 34.1% NS

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 821-821
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

R

Rosa Nadal

University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

J

Joseph M Jacob

Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

G

Gennady Bratslavsky

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

A

Alina Basnet

Renzi Cancer Center, The Guthrie Clinic, Cortland, NY

J

Jeffrey S. Ross

4Foundation Medicine, Cambrige, United States

D

Douglas I Lin

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA

O

Ole Gjoerup

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA

L

Liang Cheng

Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices

S

Shilpa Gupta

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

N

Neeraj Agarwal

Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

P

Philippe E. Spiess

R

Roger Li

Department of Genitourinary Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA

A

Ashish M. Kamat

A

Andrea Necchi

Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy

P

Petros Grivas

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA