Tumor necrosis factor alpha signaling activity and NCCN risk, adverse pathology, and progression during active surveillance in prostate cancer.
Abstract
415 Background: Elevated serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are characteristic of chronic inflammatory conditions and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Local and systemic inflammation associated with TNF-α may enhance oncogenicity in the prostate. This study investigates the association between intra-tumoral TNF-α levels, NCCN risk, adverse pathology (AP) at radical prostatectomy (RP), and progression on active surveillance (AS). Methods: Intra-tumoral TNF-α pathway expression levels were assessed through TNF-α signaling via the NF-kB pathway. Transcriptomic profiles from 82,470 prospectively collected biopsy samples with the Decipher prostate genomic classifier (Veracyte, San Diego, CA) retrieved from the Decipher GRID registry (NCT02609269) were used to compare TNF-α levels by quartile across NCCN risk groups, Decipher score, and basal-luminal prostate subtype classifier (PSC). Transcriptomic data from a retrospective study of 647 patients with low or favorable intermediate risk (FIR) disease treated with RP were used in logistic regression to examine TNF-α levels with AP (any of Gleason grade group ≥3, SVI or LNI). A cohort of 28 favorable disease patients prospectively tested (2019-2024) with Decipher and managed with AS compared TNF-α levels with Wilcoxon for the binary endpoint of progression on AS. For progression, data from a retrospective study at a single academic center (2019-2024) were classified based on progression status (n=17 progressed, n=11 did not) following Decipher analysis of their initial biopsy specimens. Results: Among 82,470 PCa patients, the proportion of highest quartile TNF-α signature increased across NCCN low to very high risk prostate cancer and the lowest quartile decreased with increased NCCN risk group (Fisher’s exact test p < 2.2e-16). Median Decipher score was 0.57 (IQR 0.38-0.78) in the highest quartile TNF-α compared to 0.38 (IQR 0.24-0.58) for the lowest. The majority of samples with the highest TNF-α were PSC basal (73%) whereas the lowest were PSC luminal (76%) subtypes. Among 647 FIR disease patients treated with RP, higher TNF-α levels were significantly associated with AP (univariable OR 3.41, p=0.02; multivariate OR 2.93, p=0.05). In the AS cohort, elevated TNF-α signature correlated with a higher likelihood of progression. Conclusions: Increased TNF-α signaling levels are associated with increasingNCCN and Decipher risk groups and basal subtype. Elevated TNF-α levels in patients with FIR disease tumors had higher risk of AP at RP. In AS, higher TNF-α signaling was associated with progression and it may serve as a tool to guide treatment counseling. Uni- and multivariable analysis for pT3b+, GG 3-5, or LNI+. Univariable OR (95% CI) P-value Multivariable OR (95% CI) P-value TNF-α 3.41 (1.21 – 9.12) 0.02* 2.93 (1.01 – 8.02) 0.05* CAPRA - - 1.43 (1.08 – 1.91) 0.01* *p < 0.05 denotes significance.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Conor Driscoll
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Nicole Handa
Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Yangyang Hao
Mohammed Alshalalfa
Alexander K. Hakansson
Veracyte, Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada
James A. Proudfoot
Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA
Elai Davicioni
Ashley Ross
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago
William Catalona
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Matthew R. Cooperberg
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Edward M. Schaeffer
Shilajit D. Kundu
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL