Tumour-free ctDNA detection as a decision tool to support organ preservation in node-negative rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, excision, and observation in the phase II NEO trial (CCTG CO.28).

J Jonathan M. Loree E Emma Titmuss (BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada) C Carl J. Brown (Providence Health - St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada) T Thereasa A. Rich (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA) D Dongsheng Tu (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada) D Derek J. Jonker (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa) C Christopher J. O'Callaghan (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada) H Hagen Fritz Kennecke (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR)

Abstract

20 Background: In the NEO trial (CCTG CO.28, NCT03259035) patients with node negative (N0) T1-T3 rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant CAPOX/FOLFOX and transanal excision surgery (TES) with the goal of organ preservation. Patients without documented response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were recommended total mesorectal excision (TME). We present a post-hoc assessment of ctDNA detection in this early-stage population and correlate kinetics with response and outcomes. Methods: Fifty-eight patients enrolled in CO.28. Whole blood was collected in EDTA tubes and processed for future ctDNA analysis at up to six timepoints: pre-chemotherapy, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (and pre-TES), yearly during surveillance for 3 years and upon progression. A total of 195 samples were analyzed with the Guardant Reveal™ assay: a tissue-free epigenomic assay leveraging >20,000 epigenomic regions for ctDNA detection. Results: Of 48 available pre-treatment samples, ctDNA was detected in 22 (46%). Sensitivity by T-stage was 14% (1/7) for T1, 53% (17/32) for T2, 44% (4/9) for T3 cancers. ctDNA detection was lower following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4/46, 9%, p<0.001 vs pre-chemotherapy). Of 41 patients with paired pre- and post-chemo samples, 49% (20/41) had undetectable ctDNA at both timepoints, 44% (18/41) had reduced tumour fraction following chemotherapy, the majority of which completely cleared ctDNA (94%; 17/18) and 7% (3/41) had an increased tumour fraction following chemotherapy (67%, 2/3 changing from negative to positive), all three of whom failed to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had TME recommended (100%). In contrast, of those that cleared ctDNA following chemotherapy, 35% had TME recommended (6/17, p=0.074). Of five recurrences (3 distant, 2 local), all had negative or reduced ctDNA tumour fraction during neoadjuvant therapy before surgical intervention. Among patients with local relapse who were managed with TES, 1/2 (50%) had detectable ctDNA at the time of local progression. No samples were available for those with distant recurrences (3/5) at time of relapse. Conclusions: The Guardant Reveal tissue-free assay was able to detect ctDNA even in this extremely early-stage cohort and identified cancers with inadequate response to therapy and in whom TME was recommended. A tissue-free approach may support timeliness of ctDNA results that would support ctDNA as an additional decision tool with endoscopic and MRI assessments to increase physician and patient comfort with organ preservation. Clinical trial information: 03259035.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 20-20
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

J

Jonathan M. Loree

E

Emma Titmuss

BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada

C

Carl J. Brown

Providence Health - St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

T

Thereasa A. Rich

Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA

D

Dongsheng Tu

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

D

Derek J. Jonker

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa

C

Christopher J. O'Callaghan

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

H

Hagen Fritz Kennecke

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR