Use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor patients undergoing total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC).

H Harrison David Winters (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) T Thanh J. Nguyen (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) R Reena Suresh (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) E Ervin J. Griffin (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) S Shannon Radomski (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) K Kareem Adams (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) C Charles Pierce (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) V Valerie Lee D Dan Laheru (Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD) N Nilo Azad (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD) D Dung T. Le A Andrea Bafford (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) A Alodia Gabre-Kidan (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) H Hillary S. Sloane (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) D Daniel L. Edelstein (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) K Kneshay Harper (Haystack Oncology, Inc, Baltimore, MD) E Emily Gramiccioni (Haystack Oncology, Inc, Baltimore, MD) H Hannah Quinn (Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD) J John Migaly (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) E Eric Scott Christenson (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD)

Abstract

30 Background: While many patients with LARC experience durable responses after TNT, relapse risk remains a concern and is not reliably predicted by standard clinicopathologic measures. ctDNA is a promising biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) that could improve post-TNT risk-stratification and guide postoperative surveillance; however, reduced sensitivity demonstrated in previous studies has limited its clinical utility in this setting. Methods: In an ongoing prospective study of patients with LARC receiving TNT, plasma was collected pre-treatment, after TNT but before surgery, post-surgery (“landmark”), and every 3 months for 1 year. ctDNA analysis was performed using a tumor-informed MRD assay interrogating up to 50 personalized variants (Haystack MRD), and results were evaluated alongside clinical outcomes. Results: Forty patients treated with TNT followed by surgery were included in this analysis. Pre-treatment ctDNA was detected in 13/13 (100%) patients. Among 34 patients with ctDNA results post-TNT, 32/34 (94%) had residual disease and 2/34 (6%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). ctDNA was detected post-TNT in 22/32 (69%) patients with residual disease, while both patients with pCR were ctDNA negative. Post-TNT sensitivity was higher in patients with pathologic stage III/IV versus I/II disease (15/18 [83%] vs 7/14 [50%]). Out of 20 patients with ctDNA results at the landmark post-surgical time point, all 5 (100%) patients with positive ctDNA relapsed, while 1/15 (7%) ctDNA-negative patients relapsed (this patient had detectable ctDNA at 6-months post-surgery), yielding 83% sensitivity and 93% negative predictive value for disease relapse at the landmark timepoint, and 100% sensitivity within 6 months of surgery. Testing of additional patients and time points is ongoing. Conclusions: A next-generation tumor-informed MRD assay shows excellent sensitivity for ctDNA detection in LARC patients pre-treatment (100%) and post-surgery (83% at landmark, 100% at 6 months). Post-TNT sensitivity was 69% overall and 83% in stage III/IV disease, representing an improvement over previous reports. These initial findings support integrating ctDNA into post-TNT risk stratification and postoperative surveillance in LARC; testing of additional patients/time points and further follow up is ongoing to validate these results.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 30-30
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

H

Harrison David Winters

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

T

Thanh J. Nguyen

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

R

Reena Suresh

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

E

Ervin J. Griffin

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

S

Shannon Radomski

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

K

Kareem Adams

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

C

Charles Pierce

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

V

Valerie Lee

D

Dan Laheru

Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

N

Nilo Azad

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD

D

Dung T. Le

A

Andrea Bafford

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

A

Alodia Gabre-Kidan

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

H

Hillary S. Sloane

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

D

Daniel L. Edelstein

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

K

Kneshay Harper

Haystack Oncology, Inc, Baltimore, MD

E

Emily Gramiccioni

Haystack Oncology, Inc, Baltimore, MD

H

Hannah Quinn

Haystack Oncology, Baltimore, MD

J

John Migaly

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

E

Eric Scott Christenson

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD