Vaccine Literacy in a Misinformation Era: Implications for Education and Public Trust 2309409
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The current 92% kindergartner vaccination coverage, central to disease/death prevention, has decreased from last year, with rising nonmedical exemptions, likely driven by widespread misinformation and myths. Public polling shows some parents trust non-medical influencers over public-health experts. Strengthening immunology literacy across undergraduate, graduate, and clinical education supports critical thinking, evidence-based interpretation, and credible source evaluation. Methods An IRB-approved, anonymous assessment (n = 11,153) across science (SM) and non-science (NSM) majors. Results Results showed that, while SM had more positive and correct vaccine beliefs, like only 37% NSM noted strongly agree to “Vaccine benefits, in general, are larger than their risks”, in contrast (p = 0.05) to 57% SM, but many were not sure. Similar results were obtained from “vaccines cause autism” with 62% of SM strongly disagreeing vs 38% NSM (p = 0.05). The value of vaccine discussions in science classes was evident from inaccuracies, like “Mercury is a component in childhood vaccines” where more SM than NSM disagreed (mercury-based thimerosal was removed from childhood vaccines in 1998), indicating the effectiveness of teaching vaccine literacy in a misinformation era. Overall data revealed that even SM could benefit from more formal discussion of myths and misinformation, as only 50.5% of SM agreed with “You do not think that you can get the flu from the flu vaccine” (vs 31.8% NSM, p = 0,05). Conclusion Strengthening immunology training equips learners to evaluate scientific evidence, identify credible sources, and counter vaccine misinformation. Persistent gaps among both science and non-science majors highlight the need for more explicit instruction in debunking myths. Vaccine literacy education that emphasizes critical source evaluation, evidence-based reasoning, and applied strategies such as role-playing is essential to sustaining vaccine confidence and public trust. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Vaccines and Immunotherapy (VAC)
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Immunology
American Association of Immunologists
Authors (3)
Katrina Etts
Quinnipiac University
Rachael Lister
Quinnipiac University
Lisa Cuchara
Quinnipiac University