Water Oxidation to Hydrogen Peroxide Over a Super‐Aerophilic Graphite Catalyst

U Umer Javed (UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia) M Mike Tebyetekerwa (Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia) C Cheng Tang (Tsinghua Center for Green Chemical Engineering Electrification, Department of Chemical Engineering) X Xiangkang Zeng Z Zhuyuan Wang (UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering) K Kaige Sun (Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia) J Jindi Yang I Ifra Marriam (School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering Centre for Materials Science Faculty of Engineering Queensland University of Technology 2 George Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 Australia) L Lijun Guo X Xin Sun A Aloka Kumar Sahu (UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia) Y Yanzhao Zhang (Nanomaterials Centre, School of Chemical Engineering and Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology) A Arash Zamyadi (Department of Civil Engineering Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia) A Aijun Du (School of Chemistry and Physics) Q Qin Li T Thomas E. Rufford (UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia) X Xiwang Zhang (UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering)

Abstract

Abstract Two‐electron water oxidation reaction (2e‐WOR) to produce hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) is an attractive anode reaction with several merits. It can be paired with several large‐scale cathode reactions that produce valuable chemical substances in an electrochemical cell. However, high‐performing and reliable 2e‐WOR anodic catalysts are yet to be fully developed. In this work, a rationally designed, inexpensive, robust, and selective graphite catalyst electrode is presented, made by following the key principle mechanisms of 2e‐WOR. First, an aerophilic graphite‐based electrode is created to leverage the challenges posed by the four‐electron WOR, where the generated O 2 from this reaction is kept onto the electrode surface to shift the O intermediates binding on graphite in the direction of improved H 2 O 2 generation. An initial improvement in H 2 O 2 selectivity of seven fold is observed, albeit with no improved H 2 O 2 generation rates. The stunted H 2 O 2 generation is ascribed to poor activity from pristine graphite, courtesy of less active sites and low intrinsic O 2 binding in the electrolyte environment. Second, to improve and balance graphite's activity and selectivity, the structure of graphite is altered via different elemental doping (with N, S, B, and P atoms), a method that allows the retention of the O 2 on the graphite surface. The super‐aerophilic B‐doped graphite catalyst (optimum) reaches a maximum Faraday efficiency (FE) of 60.6 ± 2.6% with a production rate of 26.7 ± 0.6 µmol min −1 cm −2 (85.9 ± 2.2 mA cm −2 partial current density) and excellent stability of over 120 h. In tandem, cathodic H 2 co‐production is demonstrated with an FE of above 90%. This approach demonstrates a rational approach to designing inexpensive and robust 2e‐WOR anode catalysts for H 2 O 2 and the possibility of its use in chemical co‐production at the cathode.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 37, Issue 35
Published September 01, 2025
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (17)

U

Umer Javed

UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia

M

Mike Tebyetekerwa

Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia

C

Cheng Tang

Tsinghua Center for Green Chemical Engineering Electrification, Department of Chemical Engineering

X

Xiangkang Zeng

Z

Zhuyuan Wang

UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering

K

Kaige Sun

Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia

J

Jindi Yang

I

Ifra Marriam

School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering Centre for Materials Science Faculty of Engineering Queensland University of Technology 2 George Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 Australia

L

Lijun Guo

X

Xin Sun

A

Aloka Kumar Sahu

UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia

Y

Yanzhao Zhang

Nanomaterials Centre, School of Chemical Engineering and Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology

A

Arash Zamyadi

Department of Civil Engineering Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia

A

Aijun Du

School of Chemistry and Physics

Q

Qin Li

T

Thomas E. Rufford

UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia

X

Xiwang Zhang

UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering